Sites of Dialogue, Sites of Struggle for Power in Hanan Al-Shaykh’s <i>One Thousand and One Nights</i>

Abstract The stories of The Arabian Nights have been revised multiple times throughout history, including the most popular translations, by Edward Lane (1859), Sir Richard Francis Burton (1885–1886), and Joseph-Charles Mardus (1898). Some critics consider Shahrazad as a slave, whereas others view her as a feminist. Numerous scholars argue that many of these translations display Orientalist stereotyping of Arab women and men. This study analyzes Hanan Al-Shaykh’s (2011) revision of The Arabian Nights, investigating the multiple voices presented in the text. Bakhtin’s notion of dialogism is drawn upon to read Al-Shaykh’s revision as a polyphonic novel with multiple embedded voices, such as the colonial, patriarchal, écriture féminine, and feminist. This revision highlights the dialogue between “authoritative” and “internally persuasive” discourses. Intersecting Dale Bauer’s theory of feminist dialogics with other theories such as Orientalism, écriture féminine, and carnivalesque, this study contends that a feminist persuasive narrative dominates and challenges the patriarchal masculine narrative. It also argues that the novel is disruptive in decolonizing previous Orientalist narratives, investing in feminine writing, masquerades, and reclaiming the art of storytelling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Middle East Women s Studies
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-12157962
Primary Topic
Travel Writing and Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sites of Dialogue, Sites of Struggle for Power in Hanan Al-Shaykh’s One Thousand and One Nights

Luma Balaa
Journal of Middle East Women s Studies
Travel Writing and Literature
article

Sites of Dialogue, Sites of Struggle for Power in Hanan Al-Shaykh’s One Thousand and One Nights

Luma Balaa
article en

Abstract

Abstract The stories of The Arabian Nights have been revised multiple times throughout history, including the most popular translations, by Edward Lane (1859), Sir Richard Francis Burton (1885–1886), and Joseph-Charles Mardus (1898). Some critics consider Shahrazad as a slave, whereas others view her as a feminist. Numerous scholars argue that many of these translations display Orientalist stereotyping of Arab women and men. This study analyzes Hanan Al-Shaykh’s (2011) revision of The Arabian Nights, investigating the multiple voices presented in the text. Bakhtin’s notion of dialogism is drawn upon to read Al-Shaykh’s revision as a polyphonic novel with multiple embedded voices, such as the colonial, patriarchal, écriture féminine, and feminist. This revision highlights the dialogue between “authoritative” and “internally persuasive” discourses. Intersecting Dale Bauer’s theory of feminist dialogics with other theories such as Orientalism, écriture féminine, and carnivalesque, this study contends that a feminist persuasive narrative dominates and challenges the patriarchal masculine narrative. It also argues that the novel is disruptive in decolonizing previous Orientalist narratives, investing in feminine writing, masquerades, and reclaiming the art of storytelling.

Journal of Middle East Women s Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Travel Writing and Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.