Advancing observer-reported outcome measurement: development of the MOOD-AS for observing distress in Angelman syndrome

Individuals with Angelman syndrome (AS) often experience profound communication impairment and intellectual disability, and as a result, are often unable to self-report on their experiences of emotional distress, including experiences of anxiety. However, existing measures of anxiety primarily depend on verbal descriptions of internal states, making them unsuitable tools for assessing the nature and severity of distress through observer-report for this population. To address this gap, we developed the Measure of Observable Outcomes of Distress in Angelman Syndrome (MOOD-AS), a novel observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) instrument built through a rigorous, caregiver-centered qualitative process focused on observable expressions of distress. Following FDA and ISPOR guidance for clinical outcome assessment development, we conducted concept elicitation interviews with caregivers in the United States and the Netherlands, drafted an initial item pool, mapped items against existing anxiety measures, and performed cognitive interviews to refine the instrument. Concept elicitation interviews were analyzed using content analysis, with saturation of concept assessed quantitatively. Cognitive interviews focused on evaluating item clarity, relevance, and usability. Caregivers identified 120 and 119 unique observable behaviors and situations in the U.S. (n = 17) and Netherlands (n = 8) sample. Saturation of concept was achieved. Mapping to nine existing anxiety measures revealed substantial gaps in coverage of caregiver-observable behaviors. Cognitive interviews (N = 9) confirmed strong item clarity and relevance, resulting in minor refinements to instructions, severity ratings, and caregiver impact response options. The final MOOD-AS consists of 71 caregiver-centered items assessing observable distress and anxiety-related behaviors. Psychometric properties will be assessed in the next phase of data collection. The MOOD-AS provides a rigorously developed ObsRO item set with strong qualitative evidence for content validity. Further psychometric evaluation will establish its measurement properties. Its development highlights the importance of systematically integrating caregiver observations when self-report is not feasible and offers a model for future outcome measure development in rare and nonverbal populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00975-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing observer-reported outcome measurement: development of the MOOD-AS for observing distress in Angelman syndrome

Sean N. Halpin, Doesjka A. Hagenaar, Sabine E. Mous, Anne Wheeler et al.
1 citations
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
1.82
article

Advancing observer-reported outcome measurement: development of the MOOD-AS for observing distress in Angelman syndrome

Sean N. Halpin, Doesjka A. Hagenaar, Sabine E. Mous, Anne Wheeler, Angela Gwaltney, Sarah Nelson Potter, Emma van Wooning
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Individuals with Angelman syndrome (AS) often experience profound communication impairment and intellectual disability, and as a result, are often unable to self-report on their experiences of emotional distress, including experiences of anxiety. However, existing measures of anxiety primarily depend on verbal descriptions of internal states, making them unsuitable tools for assessing the nature and severity of distress through observer-report for this population. To address this gap, we developed the Measure of Observable Outcomes of Distress in Angelman Syndrome (MOOD-AS), a novel observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) instrument built through a rigorous, caregiver-centered qualitative process focused on observable expressions of distress. Following FDA and ISPOR guidance for clinical outcome assessment development, we conducted concept elicitation interviews with caregivers in the United States and the Netherlands, drafted an initial item pool, mapped items against existing anxiety measures, and performed cognitive interviews to refine the instrument. Concept elicitation interviews were analyzed using content analysis, with saturation of concept assessed quantitatively. Cognitive interviews focused on evaluating item clarity, relevance, and usability. Caregivers identified 120 and 119 unique observable behaviors and situations in the U.S. (n = 17) and Netherlands (n = 8) sample. Saturation of concept was achieved. Mapping to nine existing anxiety measures revealed substantial gaps in coverage of caregiver-observable behaviors. Cognitive interviews (N = 9) confirmed strong item clarity and relevance, resulting in minor refinements to instructions, severity ratings, and caregiver impact response options. The final MOOD-AS consists of 71 caregiver-centered items assessing observable distress and anxiety-related behaviors. Psychometric properties will be assessed in the next phase of data collection. The MOOD-AS provides a rigorously developed ObsRO item set with strong qualitative evidence for content validity. Further psychometric evaluation will establish its measurement properties. Its development highlights the importance of systematically integrating caregiver observations when self-report is not feasible and offers a model for future outcome measure development in rare and nonverbal populations.

Journal of Patient-Reported OutcomesVol. 10(1)
RTI International (US), Erasmus MC (NL), Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (US), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.