Green Finance and the Hidden Hand of Algorithmic Planning: Debunking Market Rhetoric in the Age of Climate Governance

Abstract Green finance is widely hailed as the solution to environmental and capitalist crises, promising to address climate change and secure future returns. Yet, rather than being market‐driven, it increasingly relies on data‐intensive forecasting models and scenarios that resemble economic planning. Drawing on case studies of sustainability‐linked bonds within the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), climate stress tests by central banks, and asset managers' green portfolio strategies, we reveal how big data and algorithmic tools produced outside the market are pivotal to green finance. Although these practices expose contradictions, they also hold transformative potential. Through a financially led undemocratic form of planning, green finance wields powerful instruments we cannot leave solely to elite control. If finance is abandoning its neoliberal market addiction, then we must likewise transcend our inability to envision alternative futures. In acknowledging that planning is already happening, we can reclaim and redirect these tools towards more democratic ends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70105
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Finance and the Hidden Hand of Algorithmic Planning: Debunking Market Rhetoric in the Age of Climate Governance

Giulia Dal Maso, Alessandro Maresca
Antipode
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

Green Finance and the Hidden Hand of Algorithmic Planning: Debunking Market Rhetoric in the Age of Climate Governance

Giulia Dal Maso, Alessandro Maresca
article en

Abstract

Abstract Green finance is widely hailed as the solution to environmental and capitalist crises, promising to address climate change and secure future returns. Yet, rather than being market‐driven, it increasingly relies on data‐intensive forecasting models and scenarios that resemble economic planning. Drawing on case studies of sustainability‐linked bonds within the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), climate stress tests by central banks, and asset managers' green portfolio strategies, we reveal how big data and algorithmic tools produced outside the market are pivotal to green finance. Although these practices expose contradictions, they also hold transformative potential. Through a financially led undemocratic form of planning, green finance wields powerful instruments we cannot leave solely to elite control. If finance is abandoning its neoliberal market addiction, then we must likewise transcend our inability to envision alternative futures. In acknowledging that planning is already happening, we can reclaim and redirect these tools towards more democratic ends.

AntipodeVol. 58(1)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.