Development of the PROMOTE model to stratify colorectal cancer risk for prioritization of colonoscopy resource use: a multicenter prospective study

Colonoscopy efficacy for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is limited by inappropriate or over- prescription. Colonoscopy appropriateness prioritization (CAP) criteria have recently been proposed, but their role in CRC risk stratification remains unclear. The study objective was to derive and validate a predictive model for CRC taking account of CAP criteria, and to assess CRC occurrence in the light of appropriateness of colonoscopies.In a prospective observational study across 19 Italian centers, including adults undergoing colonoscopy outside CRC screening programs, three cohorts were analyzed for derivation, temporal validation, and geographic validation of the model. CRC risk was estimated by multivariable logistic regression. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), and two risk groups were defined: low-risk (<5%) and high-risk (≥5%). Number-needed-to-scope (NNS) was calculated.The derivation and temporal and geographic validation, cohorts included 2059, 1321, and 1924 patients, respectively, with CRC prevalence 3.6%, 3.9%, and 3%, respectively. CRC was more frequent in appropriate versus inappropriate colonoscopies. The PROMOTE model included: ages 50-59 (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-5.59), 60-69 (OR 3.87, 95%CI 1.40-10.71), and ≥70 (OR 5.35, 95%CI 2.04-14.06), versus <50; no colonoscopy in previous 10 years (OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.62-5.25); according to CAP criteria, deferrable (OR 3.44, 95%CI 1.42-8.34) and urgent (OR 16.12, 95%CI 7.15-36.36) versus nonurgent. Discrimination was good (AUROC 0.84, 95%CI 0.79-0.89). NNS was 8-9 in the high-risk group and 67-71 in the low-risk group across validation cohorts.We developed and validated the PROMOTE model, a simple tool to estimate CRC risk before colonoscopy, to support appropriate referral, optimize prioritization, and improve resource use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2751-2956
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the PROMOTE model to stratify colorectal cancer risk for prioritization of colonoscopy resource use: a multicenter prospective study

Marco Di Marco, Colin John Rees, Alessandro Mussetto, Antonio Facciorusso et al.
1 citations
Endoscopy
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Development of the PROMOTE model to stratify colorectal cancer risk for prioritization of colonoscopy resource use: a multicenter prospective study

Marco Di Marco, Colin John Rees, Alessandro Mussetto, Antonio Facciorusso, Cristiano Spada, Mário Jorge Dinis-Ribeiro, Leonardo Frazzoni, Franco Radaelli, Giulio Antonelli, Gianpiero Manes, Helga Bertani, Carlo Fabbri, Lorenzo Fuccio, Cesare Hassan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Colonoscopy efficacy for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is limited by inappropriate or over- prescription. Colonoscopy appropriateness prioritization (CAP) criteria have recently been proposed, but their role in CRC risk stratification remains unclear. The study objective was to derive and validate a predictive model for CRC taking account of CAP criteria, and to assess CRC occurrence in the light of appropriateness of colonoscopies.In a prospective observational study across 19 Italian centers, including adults undergoing colonoscopy outside CRC screening programs, three cohorts were analyzed for derivation, temporal validation, and geographic validation of the model. CRC risk was estimated by multivariable logistic regression. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), and two risk groups were defined: low-risk (<5%) and high-risk (≥5%). Number-needed-to-scope (NNS) was calculated.The derivation and temporal and geographic validation, cohorts included 2059, 1321, and 1924 patients, respectively, with CRC prevalence 3.6%, 3.9%, and 3%, respectively. CRC was more frequent in appropriate versus inappropriate colonoscopies. The PROMOTE model included: ages 50-59 (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-5.59), 60-69 (OR 3.87, 95%CI 1.40-10.71), and ≥70 (OR 5.35, 95%CI 2.04-14.06), versus <50; no colonoscopy in previous 10 years (OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.62-5.25); according to CAP criteria, deferrable (OR 3.44, 95%CI 1.42-8.34) and urgent (OR 16.12, 95%CI 7.15-36.36) versus nonurgent. Discrimination was good (AUROC 0.84, 95%CI 0.79-0.89). NNS was 8-9 in the high-risk group and 67-71 in the low-risk group across validation cohorts.We developed and validated the PROMOTE model, a simple tool to estimate CRC risk before colonoscopy, to support appropriate referral, optimize prioritization, and improve resource use.

EndoscopyVol. 58(04)
Humanitas University (IT), University of Salento (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT), Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana (IT), Azienda-Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Cesena (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Ospedale Valduce (IT), Newcastle University (GB), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.