Artificial ageing routes in AlSi10CuX secondary cast alloys

Heat treatments and alloying are the two main approaches to control the mechanical properties of Al-Si cast alloys. Ageing treatments lead to the precipitation of metastable phases rich in copper and magnesium solutes that increase hardness. However, the recycling process increases the iron content and restricts the chemical composition to the standards of pre-sorted alloy classes, requiring optimisation of the heat treatment. Therefore, we compare the efficiency of T5 and T6 ageing routes for secondary model AlSi10Cu0.1 and AlSi10Cu2.0 alloys with increased iron content. By combining DSC and microhardness measurements with electron microscopy, we characterise the precipitates. MatCalc© simulations provide insights and predictions about precipitation kinetics and precipitate sizes. In the Cu0.1 alloy, β''-Mg5Si6, β'-Mg1.8Si, and secondary silicon precipitate in the T5 condition, while the T6 condition exclusively generates finer β''-Mg 5 Si 6 . Increasing the copper concentration to 2 wt% promotes the precipitation of Q′-AlCuMgSi laths in the T5 and smaller θ'-Al 2 Cu plates and Q′AlCuMgSi laths in the T6, respectively. Increased iron content resulted in precipitate-depleted zones around the α-AlFeMnSi phases, serving as locations for incoherent precipitates. The findings indicate that the T5 is an alternative for low-copper-containing alloys, while for higher copper contents, the T6 condition is preferable. • The T6 condition increases the peak hardness compared to the T5 by 40 % for AlSi10MgCu0.1 and 60 % for AlSi10MgCu2.0. • For AlSi10MgCu0.1-T5 secondary silicon, β’’-Mg 5 Si 6 and β'-Mg 1.8 Si are the main precipitates. The T6 condition only contains the β’’-Mg 5 Si 6 . • Q’-AlCuMgSi is the main precipitate in the Cu2.0 T5 while smaller θ’-Al 2 Cu and Q’-AlCuMgSi are present in the T6 condition. • α-AlFeMnSi intermetallics generate precipitate-depleted zones and agglomerate incoherent phases around them. • MatCalc© simulations can predict precipitate size evolution and help with DSC peak identification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Today Communications
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.114491
Primary Topic
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial ageing routes in AlSi10CuX secondary cast alloys

Bernhard Stauder, Stefan Fortmüller, María Cecilia Poletti, Ilse Letofsky‐Papst
Materials Today Communications
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
article

Artificial ageing routes in AlSi10CuX secondary cast alloys

Bernhard Stauder, Stefan Fortmüller, María Cecilia Poletti, Ilse Letofsky‐Papst
article en

Abstract

Heat treatments and alloying are the two main approaches to control the mechanical properties of Al-Si cast alloys. Ageing treatments lead to the precipitation of metastable phases rich in copper and magnesium solutes that increase hardness. However, the recycling process increases the iron content and restricts the chemical composition to the standards of pre-sorted alloy classes, requiring optimisation of the heat treatment. Therefore, we compare the efficiency of T5 and T6 ageing routes for secondary model AlSi10Cu0.1 and AlSi10Cu2.0 alloys with increased iron content. By combining DSC and microhardness measurements with electron microscopy, we characterise the precipitates. MatCalc© simulations provide insights and predictions about precipitation kinetics and precipitate sizes. In the Cu0.1 alloy, β''-Mg5Si6, β'-Mg1.8Si, and secondary silicon precipitate in the T5 condition, while the T6 condition exclusively generates finer β''-Mg 5 Si 6 . Increasing the copper concentration to 2 wt% promotes the precipitation of Q′-AlCuMgSi laths in the T5 and smaller θ'-Al 2 Cu plates and Q′AlCuMgSi laths in the T6, respectively. Increased iron content resulted in precipitate-depleted zones around the α-AlFeMnSi phases, serving as locations for incoherent precipitates. The findings indicate that the T5 is an alternative for low-copper-containing alloys, while for higher copper contents, the T6 condition is preferable. • The T6 condition increases the peak hardness compared to the T5 by 40 % for AlSi10MgCu0.1 and 60 % for AlSi10MgCu2.0. • For AlSi10MgCu0.1-T5 secondary silicon, β’’-Mg 5 Si 6 and β'-Mg 1.8 Si are the main precipitates. The T6 condition only contains the β’’-Mg 5 Si 6 . • Q’-AlCuMgSi is the main precipitate in the Cu2.0 T5 while smaller θ’-Al 2 Cu and Q’-AlCuMgSi are present in the T6 condition. • α-AlFeMnSi intermetallics generate precipitate-depleted zones and agglomerate incoherent phases around them. • MatCalc© simulations can predict precipitate size evolution and help with DSC peak identification.

Materials Today CommunicationsVol. 50
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.