Quality control of the composite radar quantitative precipitation estimation product for Great Britain

• The GB radar QPE product suffers from underestimation and overestimation errors. • Underestimation errors are more frequent, especially for higher hourly rainfalls. • We propose a new QC framework to address errors in the GB radar QPE. • In comparison to gauge data, the QC reduces RMSE by 29 % and improves CC by 31 %. • The QC retains true extreme rainfalls within the GB radar QPE. High-quality gridded precipitation datasets are essential for climate and flood risk research. Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) from weather radars can provide high resolution gridded rainfall products. However, even after quality control, these datasets still suffer from underestimation (beam blockage and signal attenuation), and overestimation (radar malfunction, ground clutter, and electronic noise) errors, because most QC methods focus solely on radar reflectivity and lack a systematic and holistic approach. By comparing the radar QPE product for Great Britain (GB) (hourly, 1 km resolution, 2006 ∼ 2018), with hourly rain gauge records (∼1300), we find that radar QPE errors increase with elevation, distance from radar, and rainfall intensity. Radar QPE often underestimates high-intensity rainfalls and fails to detect many high-intensity rainfall events (≥40 mm h −1 ). Underestimation occur at 1.71 times as frequently as overestimation in radar QPE (≥0.2 mm h −1 ). We thus propose a QC framework to detect and correct beam blockages, to identify ‘normal’ and ’suspect’ rainfall fields, and to capture bad rainfalls within the radar QPE. We then use a Gaussian interpolation method to replace these bad rainfalls. Our results reveal that all GB radars suffer from beam blockage. Our novel QC framework reduces the RMSE of radar QPE compared to gauge observations from 0.546 to 0.386 (29 % reduction), increases the correlation coefficient from 0.552 to 0.725 (31 % increase), and retains real extreme rainfalls found in gauge observations. The QC framework requires minimal geographical and meteorological knowledge and can be implemented in various radar network settings, making it applicable for other regions globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134755
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality control of the composite radar quantitative precipitation estimation product for Great Britain

Stephen Blenkinsop, Adèle C. Green, H. J. Fowler, Xiaonuan Qiu
1 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
1.30
article

Quality control of the composite radar quantitative precipitation estimation product for Great Britain

Stephen Blenkinsop, Adèle C. Green, H. J. Fowler, Xiaonuan Qiu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The GB radar QPE product suffers from underestimation and overestimation errors. • Underestimation errors are more frequent, especially for higher hourly rainfalls. • We propose a new QC framework to address errors in the GB radar QPE. • In comparison to gauge data, the QC reduces RMSE by 29 % and improves CC by 31 %. • The QC retains true extreme rainfalls within the GB radar QPE. High-quality gridded precipitation datasets are essential for climate and flood risk research. Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) from weather radars can provide high resolution gridded rainfall products. However, even after quality control, these datasets still suffer from underestimation (beam blockage and signal attenuation), and overestimation (radar malfunction, ground clutter, and electronic noise) errors, because most QC methods focus solely on radar reflectivity and lack a systematic and holistic approach. By comparing the radar QPE product for Great Britain (GB) (hourly, 1 km resolution, 2006 ∼ 2018), with hourly rain gauge records (∼1300), we find that radar QPE errors increase with elevation, distance from radar, and rainfall intensity. Radar QPE often underestimates high-intensity rainfalls and fails to detect many high-intensity rainfall events (≥40 mm h −1 ). Underestimation occur at 1.71 times as frequently as overestimation in radar QPE (≥0.2 mm h −1 ). We thus propose a QC framework to detect and correct beam blockages, to identify ‘normal’ and ’suspect’ rainfall fields, and to capture bad rainfalls within the radar QPE. We then use a Gaussian interpolation method to replace these bad rainfalls. Our results reveal that all GB radars suffer from beam blockage. Our novel QC framework reduces the RMSE of radar QPE compared to gauge observations from 0.546 to 0.386 (29 % reduction), increases the correlation coefficient from 0.552 to 0.725 (31 % increase), and retains real extreme rainfalls found in gauge observations. The QC framework requires minimal geographical and meteorological knowledge and can be implemented in various radar network settings, making it applicable for other regions globally.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 666
Tyndall Centre (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.