Long term outcomes of older patients with classical hodgkin lymphoma: an analysis of the Texas cancer registry

Treatment advances for classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) have improved outcomes, but studies are lacking in older patients. This analysis aims to investigate survival trends in older individuals with cHL using the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR). Adults ≥ 65 years with cHL were separated into three eras: 1995-2002, 2003-2010, and 2011-2017. Pearson chi-squared test and cox-proportional hazard models along with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) compared demographic factors, and survival trends were assessed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. There were 386 (37.4%), 336 (32.5%), and 311 (30.1%) individuals diagnosed in 1995-2002, 2003-2010, and 2011-2017, respectively. Median DSS per era was 97 months (95% CI 50.7, 143.3), 158 months (95% CI 132.5, 183.5), and not reached, (p=0.383), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI 23.4, 40.6), 37 months (95% CI 23.5, 50.5), and 40 months (95% CI 26.8, 53.1), respectively (p=0.693). Median OS was worse for blacks and Hispanics vs non-Hispanic whites (p=0.007), increasing age (p<0.001), and higher poverty index (p=0.006). While DSS and OS have not improved over the past two decades for older individuals, there are disparity dependent survival differences by race, age, and poverty index. Strategies to reduce these disparities are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Hematology
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06539-z
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long term outcomes of older patients with classical hodgkin lymphoma: an analysis of the Texas cancer registry

Siddhartha Ganguly, Chengcheng Hu, Hala Hassanain, Ethan Burns et al.
Annals of Hematology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Long term outcomes of older patients with classical hodgkin lymphoma: an analysis of the Texas cancer registry

Siddhartha Ganguly, Chengcheng Hu, Hala Hassanain, Ethan Burns, Darshil Choksi, Carrie Yuen, Chih-Hang Anthony Tang, Sai Ravi Pingali, Yuqi Zhang, Sunil Mathur, Cesar Gentille Sanchez, Hanh Mai, Shilpan Shah
article en

Abstract

Treatment advances for classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) have improved outcomes, but studies are lacking in older patients. This analysis aims to investigate survival trends in older individuals with cHL using the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR). Adults ≥ 65 years with cHL were separated into three eras: 1995-2002, 2003-2010, and 2011-2017. Pearson chi-squared test and cox-proportional hazard models along with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) compared demographic factors, and survival trends were assessed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. There were 386 (37.4%), 336 (32.5%), and 311 (30.1%) individuals diagnosed in 1995-2002, 2003-2010, and 2011-2017, respectively. Median DSS per era was 97 months (95% CI 50.7, 143.3), 158 months (95% CI 132.5, 183.5), and not reached, (p=0.383), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI 23.4, 40.6), 37 months (95% CI 23.5, 50.5), and 40 months (95% CI 26.8, 53.1), respectively (p=0.693). Median OS was worse for blacks and Hispanics vs non-Hispanic whites (p=0.007), increasing age (p<0.001), and higher poverty index (p=0.006). While DSS and OS have not improved over the past two decades for older individuals, there are disparity dependent survival differences by race, age, and poverty index. Strategies to reduce these disparities are needed.

Annals of HematologyVol. 104(12)
Houston Methodist (US), Burroughs Wellcome Fund (US), Methodist Hospital (US), Methodist Hospital (US), Translational Research in Oncology (FR), Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.