A clinical shift toward personalized cochlear implantation: Using preoperative planning to optimize insertion depth

cochlear anatomy exhibited substantial inter-individual variability. Implementing preoperative, anatomy-tailored planning was associated with the selection of longer arrays, deeper and more consistent AID, and overall high planning accuracy. Deviations from the planned position were primarily linked to shorter CDL and intraoperative resistance, whereas deeper targets themselves did not reduce accuracy. Audiological performance at 6 months did not differ significantly between groups, although a modest trend favored the planned cohort. These findings support the feasibility of routine, examiner-independent planning and suggest that patient-specific anatomical markers should inform the selection of an appropriate electrode array.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104777
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A clinical shift toward personalized cochlear implantation: Using preoperative planning to optimize insertion depth

Marco Caversaccio, Wilhelm Wimmer, Bircher Bircher, Georgios Mantokoudis et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Otolaryngology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

A clinical shift toward personalized cochlear implantation: Using preoperative planning to optimize insertion depth

Marco Caversaccio, Wilhelm Wimmer, Bircher Bircher, Georgios Mantokoudis, Philipp Aebischer, Stephan Schraivogel, Stefan Weder
article en
1 citations

Abstract

cochlear anatomy exhibited substantial inter-individual variability. Implementing preoperative, anatomy-tailored planning was associated with the selection of longer arrays, deeper and more consistent AID, and overall high planning accuracy. Deviations from the planned position were primarily linked to shorter CDL and intraoperative resistance, whereas deeper targets themselves did not reduce accuracy. Audiological performance at 6 months did not differ significantly between groups, although a modest trend favored the planned cohort. These findings support the feasibility of routine, examiner-independent planning and suggest that patient-specific anatomical markers should inform the selection of an appropriate electrode array.

American Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 47(1)
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.