A prospective correlational study of development and validation of a comprehensive visual prostate symptom score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign enlarged prostate

Purpose: C-VPSS was developed to address challenges faced by the IPSS in assessing LUTS in men which expands upon the original VPSS aiming for a more comprehensive and culturally accessible assessment tool. The objectives were to evaluate the C-VPSS in Indian patients with LUTS due to BEP, to assess its correlation with the IPSS overall scores and their individual components, and to examine the relationship of C-VPSS components with maximum urine flow on uroflowmetry and with patients’ educational status. Materials and methods: In a 6-month prospective correlational study at an Indian tertiary care hospital with ethics committee approval, we examined 92 adult patients over 50 years with LUTS due to benign prostatomegaly who had prior uroflowmetry, excluding certain medical conditions. Data from C-VPSS and IPSS questionnaires in regional language, educational status, and Uroflowmetry were recorded and analyzed using statistical tests with P < 0.05. Results: The mean age of 92 participants was 64.47 ± 7.6 years. Median IPSS and C-VPSS scores were 20 and 18. There was a positive correlation between the overall score (Spearman rho = 0.658, P < 0.01) and the respective components of C-VPSS and IPSS. Also, Bland-Altman’s analysis showed good agreement between the 2 scores (Bias −2.27, P < 0.01). A total of 65 patients (70.7%) reported that C-VPSS was easier to understand. Furthermore, 31 patients with limited formal education only up to the school level had a greater such correlation (r = 0.74 versus 0.57) and found C-VPSS to be easier ( P = 0.02). A negative correlation between C-VPSS and maximum urine flow (Qmax) in Uroflowmetry (r = −0.442 versus −0.326) was also noted. Conclusion: Our newer “Comprehensive”-VPSS correlates and agrees significantly better with IPSS. It was simpler and easier to respond to by Indian patients, especially those with limited formal education, and correlates with uroflowmetry better than IPSS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urological Science
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/us9.0000000000000114
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective correlational study of development and validation of a comprehensive visual prostate symptom score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign enlarged prostate

Sanjoy Sureka, Aamir Hussain Usmani, Sumit Mandal, Uday Pratap Singh et al.
Urological Science
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
article

A prospective correlational study of development and validation of a comprehensive visual prostate symptom score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign enlarged prostate

Sanjoy Sureka, Aamir Hussain Usmani, Sumit Mandal, Uday Pratap Singh, Sanchit Rustagi, M. Sib Ansari
article en

Abstract

Purpose: C-VPSS was developed to address challenges faced by the IPSS in assessing LUTS in men which expands upon the original VPSS aiming for a more comprehensive and culturally accessible assessment tool. The objectives were to evaluate the C-VPSS in Indian patients with LUTS due to BEP, to assess its correlation with the IPSS overall scores and their individual components, and to examine the relationship of C-VPSS components with maximum urine flow on uroflowmetry and with patients’ educational status. Materials and methods: In a 6-month prospective correlational study at an Indian tertiary care hospital with ethics committee approval, we examined 92 adult patients over 50 years with LUTS due to benign prostatomegaly who had prior uroflowmetry, excluding certain medical conditions. Data from C-VPSS and IPSS questionnaires in regional language, educational status, and Uroflowmetry were recorded and analyzed using statistical tests with P < 0.05. Results: The mean age of 92 participants was 64.47 ± 7.6 years. Median IPSS and C-VPSS scores were 20 and 18. There was a positive correlation between the overall score (Spearman rho = 0.658, P < 0.01) and the respective components of C-VPSS and IPSS. Also, Bland-Altman’s analysis showed good agreement between the 2 scores (Bias −2.27, P < 0.01). A total of 65 patients (70.7%) reported that C-VPSS was easier to understand. Furthermore, 31 patients with limited formal education only up to the school level had a greater such correlation (r = 0.74 versus 0.57) and found C-VPSS to be easier ( P = 0.02). A negative correlation between C-VPSS and maximum urine flow (Qmax) in Uroflowmetry (r = −0.442 versus −0.326) was also noted. Conclusion: Our newer “Comprehensive”-VPSS correlates and agrees significantly better with IPSS. It was simpler and easier to respond to by Indian patients, especially those with limited formal education, and correlates with uroflowmetry better than IPSS.

Urological Science
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.