Your brain doesn’t look a day past 70! Cross-sectional associations with brain-predicted age in the cognitively-intact oldest-old
The cognitively-intact oldest-old (85 +) may be the most-resilient members of their birth cohort; due to survivorship effects (e.g., depletion of susceptibles), risk factors associated with brain aging biomarkers in younger samples may not generalize to the cognitively-intact oldest-old. We evaluated associations between established aging-related risk factors and brain-predicted age difference (brainPAD) in a cross-sectional cognitively-intact oldest-old sample. Additionally, we evaluated brainPAD-cognition associations to characterize brain maintenance vs. cognitive reserve in our sample. Oldest-old adults (N = 206; 85-99 years; Montreal Cognitive Assessment > 22 or neurologist evaluation) underwent T1-weighted MRI; brainPAD was generated with brainageR, such that more-positive brainPAD reflected more-advanced brain aging. Sex, education, alcohol and smoking history, exercise history, BMI, cardiovascular and metabolic disease history, and anticholinergic medication burden were self-reported. Global cognitive z-score and coefficient of variation were derived from the UDS 3.0 cognitive battery; crystallized-fluid discrepancy was derived from the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery. Mean brainPAD was -7.99 (SD: 5.37; range: -24.50, 6.03). Women showed more-delayed brain aging than men (B = -2.9, 95% CI = -4.6, -1.1, p = 0.002). No other exposures were significantly associated with brainPAD. BrainPAD was not associated with any cognitive variable. These findings suggest that cognitively-intact oldest-old adults may be atypically-resistant to risk factors associated with aging in younger samples, consistent with survivorship effects in aging. Furthermore, brainPAD may have limited explanatory value for cognitive performance in cognitively-intact oldest-old adults, potentially due to high cognitive reserve. Overall, our findings highlight the impact of survivorship effects on brain aging research.
Authors
- Cortney J. Jessup
- Victor A. Del Bene (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-5071)
- Noam Alperin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-2950)
- Keyanni Joy Johnson
- Tatjana Rundek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7115-9815)
- Ronald A. Cohen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-8847)
- Kristina Visscher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0737-4024)
- David A. Raichlen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4940-7886)
- Clinton B. Wright (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-6215)
- Joseph M. Gullett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-7187)
- Pradyumna K. Bharadwaj
- Eric C. Porges (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-5859)
- Mark K. Britton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-1806)
- Bonnie Levin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0931-296X)
- Theodore P. Trouard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-2283)
- Virginia G. Wadley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-8395)
- Hannah Hoogerwoerd (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8087-7314)
- Gene E. Alexander
- Georg A. Hishaw
- Stacy Merritt
- Joshua Juhasz
- Paul Stewart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-0544)
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- University of Florida Health (US)
- Civitan International (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- McKnight Brain Research Foundation (US)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- GeroScience
- Published
- 2025-12-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-02027-4
- Primary Topic
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Brain Research Foundation
- McKnight Foundation
- Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation
- National Institutes of Health