How well are national policies addressing transport poverty in Scotland?

• We reviewed transport policies addressing affordability, accessibility or safety. • Bus concessionary schemes improve affordability but miss some low-income groups. • Legislative measures can improve accessibility and safety. • A broader strategy should address all dimensions of transport poverty. Transport poverty can be caused by a lack of transport options that are available, reliable, affordable, accessible or safe. This study aimed to assess whether selected national transport policies were likely to achieve a population level impact on transport poverty in Scotland. We identified a long list of relevant policies from sources including the national transport strategy annual delivery plan. Transport Scotland officials prioritised 12 of these policies for review. Eight policies addressed affordability, three safety, and two accessibility, one of which addressed both accessibility and safety. We used available evidence, mainly from policy documentation and evaluations, to score whether these were: systematically applied; scaled up appropriately; resourced in the long term; and evidence based, to generate an overall assessment of likely population level impact. We scored eight policies as high population level impact, three medium and one low. The policies were all legislative or universally available for defined populations, with few barriers to uptake. We identified bus concessionary schemes as particularly important to improve affordability, but some low-income populations who could most benefit are not eligible. We assessed three legislative policies as likely to have a population impact on accessibility and/or safety. We conclude that addressing each dimension in isolation is not sufficient to reduce transport poverty. A broad transport poverty strategy addressing all dimensions of transport poverty should be developed to ensure everyone can access transport options to meet their needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101784
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How well are national policies addressing transport poverty in Scotland?

Adrian Davis, Joanna Teuton, C. C. Patterson, Catherine Heeney et al.
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

How well are national policies addressing transport poverty in Scotland?

Adrian Davis, Joanna Teuton, C. C. Patterson, Catherine Heeney, M. Joanne Douglas, Andrew Pulford, Timo Clemens, Anna Gale, Philip Sloan
article en

Abstract

• We reviewed transport policies addressing affordability, accessibility or safety. • Bus concessionary schemes improve affordability but miss some low-income groups. • Legislative measures can improve accessibility and safety. • A broader strategy should address all dimensions of transport poverty. Transport poverty can be caused by a lack of transport options that are available, reliable, affordable, accessible or safe. This study aimed to assess whether selected national transport policies were likely to achieve a population level impact on transport poverty in Scotland. We identified a long list of relevant policies from sources including the national transport strategy annual delivery plan. Transport Scotland officials prioritised 12 of these policies for review. Eight policies addressed affordability, three safety, and two accessibility, one of which addressed both accessibility and safety. We used available evidence, mainly from policy documentation and evaluations, to score whether these were: systematically applied; scaled up appropriately; resourced in the long term; and evidence based, to generate an overall assessment of likely population level impact. We scored eight policies as high population level impact, three medium and one low. The policies were all legislative or universally available for defined populations, with few barriers to uptake. We identified bus concessionary schemes as particularly important to improve affordability, but some low-income populations who could most benefit are not eligible. We assessed three legislative policies as likely to have a population impact on accessibility and/or safety. We conclude that addressing each dimension in isolation is not sufficient to reduce transport poverty. A broad transport poverty strategy addressing all dimensions of transport poverty should be developed to ensure everyone can access transport options to meet their needs.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 35
Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Department of Health (TW), Public Health Scotland (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.