Orchard performance of Redhaven grafted on several interspecific hybrid <i>Prunus</i> rootstocks in comparison to Bailey seedling rootstock in Southern Ontario

A 9-year orchard experiment was established to measure the performance of Rootpac®-R, Rootpac®-20, Rootpac®-40, and Rootpac®-70 rootstocks using Redhaven peach ( Prunus persica var. persica) as the scion, compared with Bailey, the current industry standard. Tree survival after 5 years was only 38% on Rootpac®-40, and the remaining rootstocks showed little or no tree mortality. Tree vigour and canopy height and width were influenced by rootstock genotype beginning the year of planting in 2016. Based on trunk cross-sectional area, after 9 years of production, Rootpac®-70 produced the largest trees followed by Rootpac®-40 and Rootpac®-R. Bailey and Rootpac®-20 had the lowest tree vigour. By year nine, cumulative yields were greatest on Rootpac®-70, measuring 5% higher than Bailey; cumulative yields of Rootpac®-R, Rootpac®-20, and Rootpac®-40 were 91%, 89%, and 81% that of Bailey, respectively. Cumulative yield efficiency was significantly influenced by rootstock, with Bailey being the most yield efficient and Rootpac®-40 the least. Rootpac®-40 generally produced the largest fruit. Based on tree vigour, high mortality of Rootpac®-40, and high suckering on Rootpac®-40, all Rootpac rootstocks evaluated in this study seem to impart excessive vigour unsuitable for higher density systems and offer no obvious advantage over Bailey rootstock, the current commercial standard in Southern Ontario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2025-0141
Primary Topic
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orchard performance of Redhaven grafted on several interspecific hybrid Prunus rootstocks in comparison to Bailey seedling rootstock in Southern Ontario

John A. Cline, Catherine J. Bakker
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
article

Orchard performance of Redhaven grafted on several interspecific hybrid Prunus rootstocks in comparison to Bailey seedling rootstock in Southern Ontario

John A. Cline, Catherine J. Bakker
article en

Abstract

A 9-year orchard experiment was established to measure the performance of Rootpac®-R, Rootpac®-20, Rootpac®-40, and Rootpac®-70 rootstocks using Redhaven peach ( Prunus persica var. persica) as the scion, compared with Bailey, the current industry standard. Tree survival after 5 years was only 38% on Rootpac®-40, and the remaining rootstocks showed little or no tree mortality. Tree vigour and canopy height and width were influenced by rootstock genotype beginning the year of planting in 2016. Based on trunk cross-sectional area, after 9 years of production, Rootpac®-70 produced the largest trees followed by Rootpac®-40 and Rootpac®-R. Bailey and Rootpac®-20 had the lowest tree vigour. By year nine, cumulative yields were greatest on Rootpac®-70, measuring 5% higher than Bailey; cumulative yields of Rootpac®-R, Rootpac®-20, and Rootpac®-40 were 91%, 89%, and 81% that of Bailey, respectively. Cumulative yield efficiency was significantly influenced by rootstock, with Bailey being the most yield efficient and Rootpac®-40 the least. Rootpac®-40 generally produced the largest fruit. Based on tree vigour, high mortality of Rootpac®-40, and high suckering on Rootpac®-40, all Rootpac rootstocks evaluated in this study seem to impart excessive vigour unsuitable for higher density systems and offer no obvious advantage over Bailey rootstock, the current commercial standard in Southern Ontario.

Canadian Journal of Plant ScienceVol. 106
University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.