A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes

For many health conditions, there are highly efficacious treatment and prevention products. Maximizing their impact requires strategies that improve the reach of health screening in order to establish who could benefit. For example, HIV prevention strategies aim to expand risk screening and to improve uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among those experiencing risk. Often, these strategies induce changes at the group-level (e.g., health clinics or communities) and are evaluated through cluster randomized trials. This scenario creates a complex, multilevel-mediation-missing data problem for the following reasons: First, the strategy is delivered at the cluster-level, while health screening and outcomes are at the individual-level. Second, the strategy improves health outcomes directly and indirectly through improved health screening. Third, everyone has an "underlying" status, which is only observed among those screened. To formally define the total effect in such settings, we use Counterfactual Strata Effects: causal estimands where the outcome is only relevant for a group whose membership is subject to missingness and/or impacted by the exposure of interest. To identify and estimate the corresponding statistical estimand, we propose a novel extension of Two-Stage targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE). Simulations demonstrate the practical performance of our approach as well as the limitations of existing approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70648
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes

Jane Kabami, Brian Beesiga, Laura B. Balzer, Gabriel Chamie et al.
Statistics in Medicine
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes

Jane Kabami, Brian Beesiga, Laura B. Balzer, Gabriel Chamie, James Ayieko, Moses Robert Kamya, Janice Litunya, Joy Z. Nakato
article en

Abstract

For many health conditions, there are highly efficacious treatment and prevention products. Maximizing their impact requires strategies that improve the reach of health screening in order to establish who could benefit. For example, HIV prevention strategies aim to expand risk screening and to improve uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among those experiencing risk. Often, these strategies induce changes at the group-level (e.g., health clinics or communities) and are evaluated through cluster randomized trials. This scenario creates a complex, multilevel-mediation-missing data problem for the following reasons: First, the strategy is delivered at the cluster-level, while health screening and outcomes are at the individual-level. Second, the strategy improves health outcomes directly and indirectly through improved health screening. Third, everyone has an "underlying" status, which is only observed among those screened. To formally define the total effect in such settings, we use Counterfactual Strata Effects: causal estimands where the outcome is only relevant for a group whose membership is subject to missingness and/or impacted by the exposure of interest. To identify and estimate the corresponding statistical estimand, we propose a novel extension of Two-Stage targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE). Simulations demonstrate the practical performance of our approach as well as the limitations of existing approaches.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 45(15-17)
University of California System (US), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE), Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration (UG), Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases (US), Makerere University (UG), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.