A negativity bias in evaluative counter-conditioning

So far, there is little evidence of a negativity bias in evaluative conditioning. In evaluative conditioning, neutral stimuli (conditioned stimuli; CSs) are paired with stimuli of either positive or negative valence; as a result, the initially neutral stimuli change their valence in the direction of the paired valent stimuli. We investigated if a negativity bias occurs when a CS is paired with both negative and positive stimuli, in sequence, in an evaluative counter-conditioning procedure. In three experiments (<i>N</i> = 100, <i>N</i> = 362, <i>N</i> = 120), conditioned stimuli (CSs) were paired with either positive or negative stimuli in an evaluative conditioning phase; then in an evaluative counter-conditioning phase, the same CSs were paired with stimuli of the opposite valence. We tested whether counter-conditioning is more effective when positively conditioned CSs are negatively counter-conditioned than when negatively conditioned CSs are positively counter-conditioned. We found this to be the case. There was no evidence that this negativity bias was driven by differences in memory. Furthermore, we found no evidence that a negativity bias (nor a positivity bias) occurs in a typical (initial) evaluative conditioning procedure. We discuss implications for understanding evaluative conditioning and negativity biases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2595576
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A negativity bias in evaluative counter-conditioning

Taylor Benedict, Anne Gast, Jehan Sparks, J. Richter
Cognition & Emotion
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

A negativity bias in evaluative counter-conditioning

Taylor Benedict, Anne Gast, Jehan Sparks, J. Richter
article en

Abstract

So far, there is little evidence of a negativity bias in evaluative conditioning. In evaluative conditioning, neutral stimuli (conditioned stimuli; CSs) are paired with stimuli of either positive or negative valence; as a result, the initially neutral stimuli change their valence in the direction of the paired valent stimuli. We investigated if a negativity bias occurs when a CS is paired with both negative and positive stimuli, in sequence, in an evaluative counter-conditioning procedure. In three experiments (<i>N</i> = 100, <i>N</i> = 362, <i>N</i> = 120), conditioned stimuli (CSs) were paired with either positive or negative stimuli in an evaluative conditioning phase; then in an evaluative counter-conditioning phase, the same CSs were paired with stimuli of the opposite valence. We tested whether counter-conditioning is more effective when positively conditioned CSs are negatively counter-conditioned than when negatively conditioned CSs are positively counter-conditioned. We found this to be the case. There was no evidence that this negativity bias was driven by differences in memory. Furthermore, we found no evidence that a negativity bias (nor a positivity bias) occurs in a typical (initial) evaluative conditioning procedure. We discuss implications for understanding evaluative conditioning and negativity biases.

Cognition & Emotion
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University of Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.