A negativity bias in evaluative counter-conditioning
So far, there is little evidence of a negativity bias in evaluative conditioning. In evaluative conditioning, neutral stimuli (conditioned stimuli; CSs) are paired with stimuli of either positive or negative valence; as a result, the initially neutral stimuli change their valence in the direction of the paired valent stimuli. We investigated if a negativity bias occurs when a CS is paired with both negative and positive stimuli, in sequence, in an evaluative counter-conditioning procedure. In three experiments (<i>N</i> = 100, <i>N</i> = 362, <i>N</i> = 120), conditioned stimuli (CSs) were paired with either positive or negative stimuli in an evaluative conditioning phase; then in an evaluative counter-conditioning phase, the same CSs were paired with stimuli of the opposite valence. We tested whether counter-conditioning is more effective when positively conditioned CSs are negatively counter-conditioned than when negatively conditioned CSs are positively counter-conditioned. We found this to be the case. There was no evidence that this negativity bias was driven by differences in memory. Furthermore, we found no evidence that a negativity bias (nor a positivity bias) occurs in a typical (initial) evaluative conditioning procedure. We discuss implications for understanding evaluative conditioning and negativity biases.
Authors
- Taylor Benedict (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-4527)
- Anne Gast (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5224-2448)
- Jehan Sparks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6997-1783)
- J. Richter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-5923)
Institutions
- TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- University of Oslo (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cognition & Emotion
- Published
- 2025-12-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2595576
- Primary Topic
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00