S3176 Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and PD-L1 Biomarker Stratification

Introduction: Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, has emerged as a treatment option for advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. It targets the PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis to restore antitumor immune responses. While it may offer superior efficacy and lower systemic toxicity compared to chemotherapy, concerns about immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs) and inconsistent biomarker stratification remain. This meta-analysis evaluates the therapeutic and adverse event profiles of pembrolizumab relative to chemotherapy, with a focus on PD-L1 biomarker-based subgroup analysis. Methods: A meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,059) was conducted, comparing pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas. Primary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), complete response (CR), stable disease (SD), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and IMAEs. Subgroup analyses were performed based on PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS ≥1 vs <1). Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Pembrolizumab was associated with a significant reduction in TRAEs (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.07-0.27) and improvements in ORR (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.24-0.54), PR (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.22-0.47), and SD (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.79). However, IMAEs were significantly more common (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.89-5.20). Subgroup analysis revealed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, whereas patients with CPS <1 experienced reduced benefit and increased IMAEs. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab improves response rates and lowers systemic toxicity compared to chemotherapy in advanced GI cancers, particularly among patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. However, clinicians should be vigilant for immune-mediated adverse events, especially in PD-L1-negative populations. These findings underscore the clinical importance of biomarker-guided therapy selection in GI oncology to optimize outcomes and reduce harm.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001140164.01956.6b
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3176 Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and PD-L1 Biomarker Stratification

Aditi Roy, Prince Shah-Riar, Asif Zamir, Sumaiya Tasnim et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

S3176 Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and PD-L1 Biomarker Stratification

Aditi Roy, Prince Shah-Riar, Asif Zamir, Sumaiya Tasnim, Tonima Ashrafi, A. K. M. Alauddin Chowdhury
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, has emerged as a treatment option for advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. It targets the PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis to restore antitumor immune responses. While it may offer superior efficacy and lower systemic toxicity compared to chemotherapy, concerns about immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs) and inconsistent biomarker stratification remain. This meta-analysis evaluates the therapeutic and adverse event profiles of pembrolizumab relative to chemotherapy, with a focus on PD-L1 biomarker-based subgroup analysis. Methods: A meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,059) was conducted, comparing pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas. Primary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), partial response (PR), complete response (CR), stable disease (SD), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and IMAEs. Subgroup analyses were performed based on PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS ≥1 vs <1). Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Pembrolizumab was associated with a significant reduction in TRAEs (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.07-0.27) and improvements in ORR (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.24-0.54), PR (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.22-0.47), and SD (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.79). However, IMAEs were significantly more common (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.89-5.20). Subgroup analysis revealed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, whereas patients with CPS <1 experienced reduced benefit and increased IMAEs. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab improves response rates and lowers systemic toxicity compared to chemotherapy in advanced GI cancers, particularly among patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. However, clinicians should be vigilant for immune-mediated adverse events, especially in PD-L1-negative populations. These findings underscore the clinical importance of biomarker-guided therapy selection in GI oncology to optimize outcomes and reduce harm.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.