S3196 Analyzing Trends in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Mortality Rates in the United States From 1999-2020

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for approximately a quarter of global cancer cases, with one-third occurring in the upper tract (esophagus, stomach, duodenum). Their shared etiology warrants a collective mortality trend analysis to identify vulnerable populations. This study analyzes mortality trends in upper GI cancer mortality in the United States from 1999-2020. Methods: We utilized death certificate data from the CDC WONDER database spanning 1999-2020, focusing on upper GI tract cancers using ICD-10 codes: C15.0-C15.5, C15.8-C15.9, C16.0-C16.6, C16.8-C16.9, and C17.0. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 population were calculated and stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, age group, geographic region, and urbanization. Joinpoint regression analysis identified statistically significant changes in temporal trends, expressed as Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC). Results: A total of 559,403 deaths from upper GI cancers were recorded in the U.S. from 1999 to 2020, with an overall decline in mortality (AAPC -1.58%). Men exhibited a substantially higher mortality rate than women (mean AAMR 33.93 vs 11.42) and a slower decline in rates (AAPC -1.62% vs -1.96%). Non-Hispanic (NH) Black individuals had the highest AAMRs (21.6) but also experienced the steepest decline (AAPC -3.51%). Other racial/ethnic groups had the following AAMRs: NH American Indian/Alaska Native (79.5), NH Asian/Pacific Islander (22.21), Hispanic (20.86), and NH White (20.43). Regionally, the Northeast had the highest burden (AAMR 22.8) but also the greatest decline (AAPC -2.02%), while the Midwest saw the slowest decrease (AAPC -1.15%). Urban areas had higher AAMRs in 1999 (25.92) compared to rural areas (23.34) but experienced a sharper decline (AAPC -1.74% vs -0.80%), resulting in lower mortality in urban areas by 2020 (20.1 vs 21.45). State-level analysis showed the District of Columbia (AAMR 28.62), Alaska (25.51), Rhode Island (24.29), Maine (24.16), Massachusetts (23.93), and Louisiana (23.81) ranked in the top 90th percentile for mortality burden. Conclusion: This study found a sustained decline in upper GI cancer mortality, reflecting advancements in preventative medicine, screening modalities, and targeted treatment. However, persistent disparities remain among men, African Americans, and rural populations. This highlights the need for tailored public health approaches and healthcare reforms to better reach high-risk groups and enhance outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001140244.33299.e2
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3196 Analyzing Trends in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Mortality Rates in the United States From 1999-2020

Muhammad Hamza Shuja, Ahmad Shahid, Huda Ahmed, Amine Rakab et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

S3196 Analyzing Trends in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Mortality Rates in the United States From 1999-2020

Muhammad Hamza Shuja, Ahmad Shahid, Huda Ahmed, Amine Rakab, Syed Hasan Shuja, Bisher Sawaf, Umar Ali Khan, Amin Abu Hejleh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for approximately a quarter of global cancer cases, with one-third occurring in the upper tract (esophagus, stomach, duodenum). Their shared etiology warrants a collective mortality trend analysis to identify vulnerable populations. This study analyzes mortality trends in upper GI cancer mortality in the United States from 1999-2020. Methods: We utilized death certificate data from the CDC WONDER database spanning 1999-2020, focusing on upper GI tract cancers using ICD-10 codes: C15.0-C15.5, C15.8-C15.9, C16.0-C16.6, C16.8-C16.9, and C17.0. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 population were calculated and stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, age group, geographic region, and urbanization. Joinpoint regression analysis identified statistically significant changes in temporal trends, expressed as Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC). Results: A total of 559,403 deaths from upper GI cancers were recorded in the U.S. from 1999 to 2020, with an overall decline in mortality (AAPC -1.58%). Men exhibited a substantially higher mortality rate than women (mean AAMR 33.93 vs 11.42) and a slower decline in rates (AAPC -1.62% vs -1.96%). Non-Hispanic (NH) Black individuals had the highest AAMRs (21.6) but also experienced the steepest decline (AAPC -3.51%). Other racial/ethnic groups had the following AAMRs: NH American Indian/Alaska Native (79.5), NH Asian/Pacific Islander (22.21), Hispanic (20.86), and NH White (20.43). Regionally, the Northeast had the highest burden (AAMR 22.8) but also the greatest decline (AAPC -2.02%), while the Midwest saw the slowest decrease (AAPC -1.15%). Urban areas had higher AAMRs in 1999 (25.92) compared to rural areas (23.34) but experienced a sharper decline (AAPC -1.74% vs -0.80%), resulting in lower mortality in urban areas by 2020 (20.1 vs 21.45). State-level analysis showed the District of Columbia (AAMR 28.62), Alaska (25.51), Rhode Island (24.29), Maine (24.16), Massachusetts (23.93), and Louisiana (23.81) ranked in the top 90th percentile for mortality burden. Conclusion: This study found a sustained decline in upper GI cancer mortality, reflecting advancements in preventative medicine, screening modalities, and targeted treatment. However, persistent disparities remain among men, African Americans, and rural populations. This highlights the need for tailored public health approaches and healthcare reforms to better reach high-risk groups and enhance outcomes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.