S3024 Risks of Gastrointestinal Malignancies in Short Bowel Syndrome Patients Treated With Teduglutide: Results From TriNetX

Introduction: Teduglutide, a recombinant glucagon-like peptide-2 analog, enhances intestinal absorption and is approved for treating short bowel syndrome (SBS). The STEPS trial reported a treatment-related case of metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) adenocarcinoma, raising concerns about malignancy risk with teduglutide. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of GI malignancies—specifically esophageal, pancreatic, small bowel, and colon—in SBS patients treated with teduglutide using real-world data from TriNetX. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Two cohorts were identified: SBS patients treated with teduglutide (n = 514), and control (SBS patients not treated with teduglutide) (n = 12,120). Patients with a prior history of esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, small bowel, or colon cancer were excluded. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 514 patients remained in each group. Cancer incidence was assessed 180 days post-index. Outcomes included the incidence rate, risk differences, and esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and colon cancers. Analyses included risk comparisons and Kaplan-Meier survival. Results: Post-matching, cohorts were balanced for demographics and comorbidities. Mean follow-up time was 950 days in the teduglutide group vs 1,219 days in the control group. Small Bowel Cancer: No cases in either group. Colon Cancer: 0 cases in the teduglutide group vs 10 cases (1.9%) in controls (Risk difference: -0.019; 95% CI: -0.031 to -0.008; P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis favored teduglutide (P = 0.002). Pancreatic Cancer: 10 cases (1.9%) in each group; no significant difference (Risk difference = 0; P = 1.0). Esophageal Cancer: 0 cases in the teduglutide group vs 10 cases (1.9%) in controls (Risk difference = -0.019; P = 0.001). Survival analysis was not statistically significant (P = 0.314). Conclusion: Despite earlier concerns, this large, matched cohort study found no increased incidence of GI malignancies in SBS patients treated with teduglutide. Notably, colon and esophageal cancers were observed exclusively in the control group. These findings support the long-term oncologic safety of teduglutide in SBS patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139556.96682.ad
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3024 Risks of Gastrointestinal Malignancies in Short Bowel Syndrome Patients Treated With Teduglutide: Results From TriNetX

Ahmad Nawaz, Faruq Pradhan, Anasua Deb, Muhammad Bilal Khan Niazi et al.
1 citations
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
1.12
article

S3024 Risks of Gastrointestinal Malignancies in Short Bowel Syndrome Patients Treated With Teduglutide: Results From TriNetX

Ahmad Nawaz, Faruq Pradhan, Anasua Deb, Muhammad Bilal Khan Niazi, Nurlan Aliyev, Fedja A. Rochling
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Teduglutide, a recombinant glucagon-like peptide-2 analog, enhances intestinal absorption and is approved for treating short bowel syndrome (SBS). The STEPS trial reported a treatment-related case of metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) adenocarcinoma, raising concerns about malignancy risk with teduglutide. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of GI malignancies—specifically esophageal, pancreatic, small bowel, and colon—in SBS patients treated with teduglutide using real-world data from TriNetX. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Two cohorts were identified: SBS patients treated with teduglutide (n = 514), and control (SBS patients not treated with teduglutide) (n = 12,120). Patients with a prior history of esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, small bowel, or colon cancer were excluded. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 514 patients remained in each group. Cancer incidence was assessed 180 days post-index. Outcomes included the incidence rate, risk differences, and esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and colon cancers. Analyses included risk comparisons and Kaplan-Meier survival. Results: Post-matching, cohorts were balanced for demographics and comorbidities. Mean follow-up time was 950 days in the teduglutide group vs 1,219 days in the control group. Small Bowel Cancer: No cases in either group. Colon Cancer: 0 cases in the teduglutide group vs 10 cases (1.9%) in controls (Risk difference: -0.019; 95% CI: -0.031 to -0.008; P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis favored teduglutide (P = 0.002). Pancreatic Cancer: 10 cases (1.9%) in each group; no significant difference (Risk difference = 0; P = 1.0). Esophageal Cancer: 0 cases in the teduglutide group vs 10 cases (1.9%) in controls (Risk difference = -0.019; P = 0.001). Survival analysis was not statistically significant (P = 0.314). Conclusion: Despite earlier concerns, this large, matched cohort study found no increased incidence of GI malignancies in SBS patients treated with teduglutide. Notably, colon and esophageal cancers were observed exclusively in the control group. These findings support the long-term oncologic safety of teduglutide in SBS patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.