S3017 Navigating Parental Leave During GI Fellowship: Impact of a Trainee-Specific Educational Session

Introduction: Fair, transparent, and well-communicated parental leave policies have been shown to be important for recruiting, retaining, and supporting gastroenterology (GI) trainees. However, many face uncertainty, stigma, and systemic barriers when navigating leave during training. Previous studies have identified that women in particular report being dissuaded from GI fellowship due to concerns about lack of parental leave. This study evaluated trainees’ knowledge of leave policies, their experiences taking leave, and the impact of a targeted educational intervention. Methods: At the 2025 Scrubs & Heels Leadership Summit, a trainee-focused session addressed navigating parental leave during training. Prior to the session, trainees completed a survey assessing awareness of institutional and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) leave policies, and prior leave experiences. The interactive session covered ACGME, institutional, and state policies, Family & Medical Leave Act, short-term disability, board eligibility, and practical negotiation strategies. Post-session surveys measured changes in knowledge, comfort, and preparedness. Results: Forty-nine female trainees attended with 89.8 and 81.6% pre- and post-survey response rates. At baseline, 50% were unaware of institutional or ACGME leave policies. Fifty percent expressed discomfort discussing parental leave with program leadership. Barriers to taking leave included workload redistribution (37%), burdening peers (22%), and training extension (22%). 29.5% took leave during training, of which 40% felt taking leave negatively impacted performance evaluations. There was wide variation in call coverage. Most found returning to work challenging, and most did not receive schedule accommodations. Following the session, over 95% demonstrated improved understanding of leave policies and board eligibility, 82.5% felt more comfortable discussing leave policies and negotiating schedules, and 97.5.% would recommend the session to other trainees. Conclusion: GI trainees face substantial gaps in knowledge, support, and communication regarding parental leave. Many fear stigma, logistical burdens, and adverse career impacts. This session greatly improved awareness and self-efficacy in navigating leave. Institutions must develop transparent, equitable, and trainee-centered leave policies to foster an inclusive training environment, support work-life integration, and ensure equitable advancement for all future parents and caregivers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139528.23761.f6
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3017 Navigating Parental Leave During GI Fellowship: Impact of a Trainee-Specific Educational Session

Jamie Horrigan, Ahmad Farooq, Lauren D. Feld, Aline Charabaty et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

S3017 Navigating Parental Leave During GI Fellowship: Impact of a Trainee-Specific Educational Session

Jamie Horrigan, Ahmad Farooq, Lauren D. Feld, Aline Charabaty, Anita Afzali
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Fair, transparent, and well-communicated parental leave policies have been shown to be important for recruiting, retaining, and supporting gastroenterology (GI) trainees. However, many face uncertainty, stigma, and systemic barriers when navigating leave during training. Previous studies have identified that women in particular report being dissuaded from GI fellowship due to concerns about lack of parental leave. This study evaluated trainees’ knowledge of leave policies, their experiences taking leave, and the impact of a targeted educational intervention. Methods: At the 2025 Scrubs & Heels Leadership Summit, a trainee-focused session addressed navigating parental leave during training. Prior to the session, trainees completed a survey assessing awareness of institutional and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) leave policies, and prior leave experiences. The interactive session covered ACGME, institutional, and state policies, Family & Medical Leave Act, short-term disability, board eligibility, and practical negotiation strategies. Post-session surveys measured changes in knowledge, comfort, and preparedness. Results: Forty-nine female trainees attended with 89.8 and 81.6% pre- and post-survey response rates. At baseline, 50% were unaware of institutional or ACGME leave policies. Fifty percent expressed discomfort discussing parental leave with program leadership. Barriers to taking leave included workload redistribution (37%), burdening peers (22%), and training extension (22%). 29.5% took leave during training, of which 40% felt taking leave negatively impacted performance evaluations. There was wide variation in call coverage. Most found returning to work challenging, and most did not receive schedule accommodations. Following the session, over 95% demonstrated improved understanding of leave policies and board eligibility, 82.5% felt more comfortable discussing leave policies and negotiating schedules, and 97.5.% would recommend the session to other trainees. Conclusion: GI trainees face substantial gaps in knowledge, support, and communication regarding parental leave. Many fear stigma, logistical burdens, and adverse career impacts. This session greatly improved awareness and self-efficacy in navigating leave. Institutions must develop transparent, equitable, and trainee-centered leave policies to foster an inclusive training environment, support work-life integration, and ensure equitable advancement for all future parents and caregivers.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.