S3034 Transforming IBD Diagnostics: A Multicenter Validation Study on Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy

Introduction: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a key diagnostic tool for evaluating small bowel conditions, particularly Crohn’s disease. Detecting ulcers and erosions is essential for assessing disease activity, guiding treatment, and monitoring response. However, CE interpretation is time-consuming and prone to inter- reader variability. Artificial intelligence (AI), especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), offers a promising solution by improving lesion detection, reducing variability, and shortening reading times. This study aimed to develop and validate an AI model for detecting and differentiating small bowel ulcers and erosions across multiple CE devices and clinical centers. Methods: A multicenter, prospective study was conducted between January 2021 and April 2025 across 9 centers in Europe (Portugal and Spain), South America (Brazil), Australia, and the USA. Three CE systems (PillCam SB2, SB3 and Olympus EC-10) were used to perform 398 anonymized exams. AI-assisted readings generated by a deep learning model were compared with standard-of- care (SoC) readings, using expert board consensus as the gold standard. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Ulcers and erosions were identified in 133 patients (33.4%) during expert review. SoC readings showed 68.9% sensitivity, 92.8% specificity, 82.7% PPV, 85.7% NPV, and 84.8% accuracy. AI-assisted readings achieved 87.9% sensitivity, 81.4% specificity, 70.3% PPV, 93.0% NPV, and 83.5% accuracy. The AI model detected 165 lesions versus 110 with SoC, performing consistently across CE platforms and centers. Mean AI-assisted reading time was 239 seconds (SD 138 seconds) per exam. Conclusion: The AI model demonstrated higher sensitivity and reduced reading time compared to SoC. This is the first multicenter, interoperable validation of an AI tool for detecting and differentiating ulcers and erosions using data from multiple CE systems. These findings support AI integration as a reliable and efficient approach to enhance CE-based assessment in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139596.58511.e2
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3034 Transforming IBD Diagnostics: A Multicenter Validation Study on Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy

João Ferreira, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, Cecílio Santander, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S3034 Transforming IBD Diagnostics: A Multicenter Validation Study on Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy

João Ferreira, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, Cecílio Santander, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Maria João Almeida, Jaime S. Cardoso, Eunice Anita Moura Fortes, Pedro Emartino Bezerra Campelo, Arthur J. Kaffes, Bruno Bezerra Rosa, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Miguel A. Martins, Cristiane R Macedo, Benjamin Niland, Tiago Ribeiro, Miguel Mascarenhas, José Cotter, William Sonnier, Francisco Mendes, Jack Di Palma, Guilherme Macedo, Joana Portugal Mota, Thiago Alves Cavalcante, Ana Pérez González, Jorge Mendoza, João Afonso, Matheus Ferreira de Carvalho, Patrícia Andrade, António Costa, Hélder Cardoso, Robert Feller
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a key diagnostic tool for evaluating small bowel conditions, particularly Crohn’s disease. Detecting ulcers and erosions is essential for assessing disease activity, guiding treatment, and monitoring response. However, CE interpretation is time-consuming and prone to inter- reader variability. Artificial intelligence (AI), especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), offers a promising solution by improving lesion detection, reducing variability, and shortening reading times. This study aimed to develop and validate an AI model for detecting and differentiating small bowel ulcers and erosions across multiple CE devices and clinical centers. Methods: A multicenter, prospective study was conducted between January 2021 and April 2025 across 9 centers in Europe (Portugal and Spain), South America (Brazil), Australia, and the USA. Three CE systems (PillCam SB2, SB3 and Olympus EC-10) were used to perform 398 anonymized exams. AI-assisted readings generated by a deep learning model were compared with standard-of- care (SoC) readings, using expert board consensus as the gold standard. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Ulcers and erosions were identified in 133 patients (33.4%) during expert review. SoC readings showed 68.9% sensitivity, 92.8% specificity, 82.7% PPV, 85.7% NPV, and 84.8% accuracy. AI-assisted readings achieved 87.9% sensitivity, 81.4% specificity, 70.3% PPV, 93.0% NPV, and 83.5% accuracy. The AI model detected 165 lesions versus 110 with SoC, performing consistently across CE platforms and centers. Mean AI-assisted reading time was 239 seconds (SD 138 seconds) per exam. Conclusion: The AI model demonstrated higher sensitivity and reduced reading time compared to SoC. This is the first multicenter, interoperable validation of an AI tool for detecting and differentiating ulcers and erosions using data from multiple CE systems. These findings support AI integration as a reliable and efficient approach to enhance CE-based assessment in inflammatory bowel disease.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.