S3043 Inpatient Video Capsule Endoscopy: Why the Incomplete Rates?

Introduction: Incomplete bowel transit after video capsule endoscopy (VCE) placement is a common challenge in patients undergoing small bowel evaluation, especially amongst hospitalized patients. Our aims were to compare VCE completion rates between patients who underwent VCE as inpatients vs outpatients and identify patient related risk factors associated with incomplete studies. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective study of patients who underwent small bowel VCE at a tertiary referral center between 1/2022 and 6/2024. Baseline patient characteristics including demographics and medical history were collected. Details of capsule placement and recordings were also obtained. Continuous variables were summarized as mean (SD) and categorical variables were reported as frequency (%). Continuous variables were compared using independent t-test and categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test. Comparisons between inpatient and outpatient groups and then between complete vs incomplete studies were performed. Analysis was performed using SPSS-29 and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 128 patients undergoing VCE were included: 63 inpatients and 65 outpatients. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, BMI, ethnicity, and comorbid conditions. More outpatients were on GLP1 receptor agonists (RA) compared to inpatients (13.8% vs 1.6%, P = 0.02). VCEs performed in the inpatient setting were more likely to be incomplete compared to outpatients (39.7% vs 12.3%, P < 0.001). Mean gastric transit time was longer for inpatients compared to outpatients (126.1 min ± SD 107.9) vs 39.1 min ± SD 49.2, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Inpatients have prolonged gastric transit times compared with outpatients which is associated with an increased rate of incomplete studies. This is despite more outpatients being on GLP1 RA. One strategy to consider for increasing completion rates is to administer 12-hour capsules for all inpatients and encourage ambulation when possible. Another approach would be to implement a standardized protocol where the capsule location is assessed early after capsule ingestion to ensure it has left the stomach. Future studies including a larger sample size are needed to understand additional characteristics associated with incomplete inpatient VCE studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139632.67794.91
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3043 Inpatient Video Capsule Endoscopy: Why the Incomplete Rates?

Aya Tamim, Hani Tamim, Francis A. Farraye, Osayande Osagiede et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S3043 Inpatient Video Capsule Endoscopy: Why the Incomplete Rates?

Aya Tamim, Hani Tamim, Francis A. Farraye, Osayande Osagiede, Jessica C. Petrov, Bhaumik Brahmbhatt, Asrita Vattikonda, Frank Lukens, Jana G. Hashash
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Incomplete bowel transit after video capsule endoscopy (VCE) placement is a common challenge in patients undergoing small bowel evaluation, especially amongst hospitalized patients. Our aims were to compare VCE completion rates between patients who underwent VCE as inpatients vs outpatients and identify patient related risk factors associated with incomplete studies. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective study of patients who underwent small bowel VCE at a tertiary referral center between 1/2022 and 6/2024. Baseline patient characteristics including demographics and medical history were collected. Details of capsule placement and recordings were also obtained. Continuous variables were summarized as mean (SD) and categorical variables were reported as frequency (%). Continuous variables were compared using independent t-test and categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test. Comparisons between inpatient and outpatient groups and then between complete vs incomplete studies were performed. Analysis was performed using SPSS-29 and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 128 patients undergoing VCE were included: 63 inpatients and 65 outpatients. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, BMI, ethnicity, and comorbid conditions. More outpatients were on GLP1 receptor agonists (RA) compared to inpatients (13.8% vs 1.6%, P = 0.02). VCEs performed in the inpatient setting were more likely to be incomplete compared to outpatients (39.7% vs 12.3%, P < 0.001). Mean gastric transit time was longer for inpatients compared to outpatients (126.1 min ± SD 107.9) vs 39.1 min ± SD 49.2, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Inpatients have prolonged gastric transit times compared with outpatients which is associated with an increased rate of incomplete studies. This is despite more outpatients being on GLP1 RA. One strategy to consider for increasing completion rates is to administer 12-hour capsules for all inpatients and encourage ambulation when possible. Another approach would be to implement a standardized protocol where the capsule location is assessed early after capsule ingestion to ensure it has left the stomach. Future studies including a larger sample size are needed to understand additional characteristics associated with incomplete inpatient VCE studies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.