S3041 Falling Through the Cracks: Many Patients With Incomplete Celiac Disease Evaluations

Introduction: Tissue transglutaminase antibody testing (TTG-IgA) combined with duodenal histopathology is the guideline recommendation for celiac disease evaluation. To ensure accurate testing, patients must continue consuming gluten during diagnostic evaluation, otherwise TTG-IgA antibodies will decline, and biopsies will normalize. It is unknown how many patients stop the diagnostic workup prematurely. The aim of this study was to determine how often patients who begin testing for celiac disease complete the diagnostic evaluation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing celiac disease testing from 2005-2021 at our institution. Adults ≥18 were included who had a TTG-IgA serology test or a duodenal biopsy performed. Workup completion was tracked based on test order. For statistical analysis, Chi-squared test was used for comparison of proportions to analyze workup completion. Results: During the study period, 61,533 patients had duodenal biopsies. Only 33.7% of those patients who had duodenal biopsy had antibody testing for celiac disease. Of those patients who received TTG-IgA antibody testing, only 49.2% had it done in proximity to their biopsy for timely clinical information. In total 162,999 patients had TTG-IgA antibody testing in the study period. The incidence of a positive TTG-IgA antibody was 2.4%. Of those with a positive TTG-IgA antibody, only 42.5% went on to get an endoscopy. Just 61.8% of those getting the endoscopy had a biopsy of their duodenum; 638 patients with a positive TTG-IgA got an endoscopy but did not have a duodenal biopsy specimen submitted. Of those who had a duodenal biopsy, 55.9% had the biopsy taken in proximity to their antibody testing. In total <15% of patients with a positive antibody completed a biopsy in a timely fashion. Patients were more likely to be biopsied if their TTG-IgA antibody was positive (26.3%) versus negative (16.5%) (P < 0.0001). Patients receiving a biopsy first were more likely to complete a timely evaluation (16.6%) versus patients who had a positive TTG-IgA antibody result first (14.7%) (P < 0.002). Conclusion: Many patients are lost to follow up while undergoing celiac disease evaluation. This gap highlights an opportunity to increase workup completion for an accurate and timely celiac disease evaluation. Further research is needed to understand patient, physician, and healthcare organization factors that contribute to poor workup completion rates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139624.48979.ca
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3041 Falling Through the Cracks: Many Patients With Incomplete Celiac Disease Evaluations

Claire Jansson‐Knodell, Elizabeth N. Dewey, Adam T. Perzynski, Jarrod E. Dalton et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

S3041 Falling Through the Cracks: Many Patients With Incomplete Celiac Disease Evaluations

Claire Jansson‐Knodell, Elizabeth N. Dewey, Adam T. Perzynski, Jarrod E. Dalton, Kathryn A. Martinez, Alberto Rubio Tapia
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Tissue transglutaminase antibody testing (TTG-IgA) combined with duodenal histopathology is the guideline recommendation for celiac disease evaluation. To ensure accurate testing, patients must continue consuming gluten during diagnostic evaluation, otherwise TTG-IgA antibodies will decline, and biopsies will normalize. It is unknown how many patients stop the diagnostic workup prematurely. The aim of this study was to determine how often patients who begin testing for celiac disease complete the diagnostic evaluation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing celiac disease testing from 2005-2021 at our institution. Adults ≥18 were included who had a TTG-IgA serology test or a duodenal biopsy performed. Workup completion was tracked based on test order. For statistical analysis, Chi-squared test was used for comparison of proportions to analyze workup completion. Results: During the study period, 61,533 patients had duodenal biopsies. Only 33.7% of those patients who had duodenal biopsy had antibody testing for celiac disease. Of those patients who received TTG-IgA antibody testing, only 49.2% had it done in proximity to their biopsy for timely clinical information. In total 162,999 patients had TTG-IgA antibody testing in the study period. The incidence of a positive TTG-IgA antibody was 2.4%. Of those with a positive TTG-IgA antibody, only 42.5% went on to get an endoscopy. Just 61.8% of those getting the endoscopy had a biopsy of their duodenum; 638 patients with a positive TTG-IgA got an endoscopy but did not have a duodenal biopsy specimen submitted. Of those who had a duodenal biopsy, 55.9% had the biopsy taken in proximity to their antibody testing. In total <15% of patients with a positive antibody completed a biopsy in a timely fashion. Patients were more likely to be biopsied if their TTG-IgA antibody was positive (26.3%) versus negative (16.5%) (P < 0.0001). Patients receiving a biopsy first were more likely to complete a timely evaluation (16.6%) versus patients who had a positive TTG-IgA antibody result first (14.7%) (P < 0.002). Conclusion: Many patients are lost to follow up while undergoing celiac disease evaluation. This gap highlights an opportunity to increase workup completion for an accurate and timely celiac disease evaluation. Further research is needed to understand patient, physician, and healthcare organization factors that contribute to poor workup completion rates.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.