S3040 Deep Learning Algorithm for Duodenal Biopsy Classification

Introduction: Duodenal biopsy combined with tissue transglutaminase (TTG-IgA) antibodies is the gold standard for celiac disease diagnosis. Issues with biopsy include artifacts, poorly oriented specimens, and inter-observer variability. Artificial intelligence has the potential to address these challenges. We aimed to determine if deep learning, image analysis using artificial intelligence, can be used on duodenal biopsies to accurately diagnose celiac disease. Methods: The target study population were individuals with a duodenal biopsy and TTG-IgA antibody test. Inclusion criteria were adults ≥18 years. Exclusion criteria were those following a gluten-free diet. The study period was 2008-2021. Patients were grouped into 5 categories: controls, celiac disease, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) only, IELs with a positive TTG-IgA antibody, and seronegative villous atrophy. Biopsy were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Whole slide images were obtained and placed on a High-Performance Computing node with a graphics processing unit. Clustering-constrained attention multiple-instance learning was the deep learning algorithm used. A patch size of 256 × 256 pixels was used for the segmentation step. The dataset was split into training, validation, and testing splits with 10-fold cross validation. Accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were reported for each fold. Results: A total of 2,392 patients’ whole slide images were included: 1290 controls, 414 celiac disease, 441 IELs only, 84 IELs with a positive TTG-IgA, and 163 with seronegative villous atrophy. For all categories, the average AUC was 0.849 with an accuracy of 71%. The best performing fold had an AUC of 0.884 with 75% accuracy. The confusion matrix for this fold demonstrates difficulty differentiating between IELs with a positive TTG-IgA antibody and other classifications. The model reliably differentiated celiac disease from controls average with AUC 0.992 and accuracy 97%. To distinguish celiac disease from seronegative villous atrophy the average AUC was 0.810 with accuracy 76%. Conclusion: This deep learning model can discriminate between celiac disease and normal histology. It can also separate patients into 5 classifications, representing a promising tool that would benefit from further optimization to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce the manual pathology review burden, and enhance resource management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139620.61245.62
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3040 Deep Learning Algorithm for Duodenal Biopsy Classification

Claire Jansson‐Knodell, Ivan Pak Lok Yu, Erica Savage, Scott Robertson et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

S3040 Deep Learning Algorithm for Duodenal Biopsy Classification

Claire Jansson‐Knodell, Ivan Pak Lok Yu, Erica Savage, Scott Robertson, Matthew Kerosky, Rich Fong, Alberto Rubio Tapia, Katherine Poissant
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Duodenal biopsy combined with tissue transglutaminase (TTG-IgA) antibodies is the gold standard for celiac disease diagnosis. Issues with biopsy include artifacts, poorly oriented specimens, and inter-observer variability. Artificial intelligence has the potential to address these challenges. We aimed to determine if deep learning, image analysis using artificial intelligence, can be used on duodenal biopsies to accurately diagnose celiac disease. Methods: The target study population were individuals with a duodenal biopsy and TTG-IgA antibody test. Inclusion criteria were adults ≥18 years. Exclusion criteria were those following a gluten-free diet. The study period was 2008-2021. Patients were grouped into 5 categories: controls, celiac disease, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) only, IELs with a positive TTG-IgA antibody, and seronegative villous atrophy. Biopsy were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Whole slide images were obtained and placed on a High-Performance Computing node with a graphics processing unit. Clustering-constrained attention multiple-instance learning was the deep learning algorithm used. A patch size of 256 × 256 pixels was used for the segmentation step. The dataset was split into training, validation, and testing splits with 10-fold cross validation. Accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were reported for each fold. Results: A total of 2,392 patients’ whole slide images were included: 1290 controls, 414 celiac disease, 441 IELs only, 84 IELs with a positive TTG-IgA, and 163 with seronegative villous atrophy. For all categories, the average AUC was 0.849 with an accuracy of 71%. The best performing fold had an AUC of 0.884 with 75% accuracy. The confusion matrix for this fold demonstrates difficulty differentiating between IELs with a positive TTG-IgA antibody and other classifications. The model reliably differentiated celiac disease from controls average with AUC 0.992 and accuracy 97%. To distinguish celiac disease from seronegative villous atrophy the average AUC was 0.810 with accuracy 76%. Conclusion: This deep learning model can discriminate between celiac disease and normal histology. It can also separate patients into 5 classifications, representing a promising tool that would benefit from further optimization to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce the manual pathology review burden, and enhance resource management.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.