S3037 Inpatient Enteroscopy in Celiac Disease: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Utilization, Diagnostic Yield, and Clinical Outcomes From a Nationwide Dataset

Introduction: Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic immune-mediated enteropathy that may warrant advanced small bowel evaluation in cases of refractory symptoms, alarm features, or suspected malignancy. Enteroscopy enables deep small bowel visualization and tissue diagnosis but is infrequently performed during hospitalization. Despite its utility, data on its inpatient use, diagnostic yield, and associated outcomes are limited. This study examined national trends, diagnostic performance, and short-term clinical outcomes of inpatient enteroscopy in hospitalized CD patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adult CD hospitalizations in HCUP-NIS (2016–2020). CD and enteroscopy were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-CM code K90.0 and ICD-10-PCS codes, respectively. Primary outcomes: in-hospital mortality, LOS, and cost. Secondary outcomes: GIST, small bowel adenocarcinoma, and complications (bleeding, pancreatitis, ileus). Survey-weighted multivariable models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR), rate ratios, and costs, adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance, Charlson index, and hospital factors. Results: Among 190,235 CD hospitalizations (2016–2020), only 55 (0.03%) involved inpatient enteroscopy, with no significant change in utilization over time (P = 0.7). Enteroscopy was associated with significantly longer LOS (13.6 ± 3.5 vs 4.6 ± 0.03 days; aRR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.45–4.12; P < 0.001) and higher hospitalization costs ($42,242 vs $14,156; aRR 2.74, 95% CI: 1.38–5.47; P = 0.004). In-hospital mortality was numerically higher (9.1% vs 1.4%) but not statistically significant (aOR 4.1, 95% CI: 0.36–46.7; P = 0.3). Diagnostic yield was notably elevated: small bowel adenocarcinoma and GIST were detected in 14.5% and 12.7% of enteroscopy patients vs 0.09% and 0.03% in controls (aOR 61.2 and 79.3; both P < 0.001). No major complications occurred. These findings suggest inpatient enteroscopy, though rarely used, is highly effective for malignancy detection in high-risk CD cases without observed harm. Conclusion: Inpatient enteroscopy is infrequently used in hospitalized celiac disease patients but is strongly associated with increased diagnostic yield for small bowel malignancies and higher resource utilization. These findings support its targeted use in selected high-risk populations and underscore the need for prospective studies to refine its inpatient role, optimize timing, and guide clinical decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139608.51485.98
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3037 Inpatient Enteroscopy in Celiac Disease: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Utilization, Diagnostic Yield, and Clinical Outcomes From a Nationwide Dataset

Savanna Thor, Peter Lymberopoulos, Madia Ahad, Anwar Uddin et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

S3037 Inpatient Enteroscopy in Celiac Disease: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Utilization, Diagnostic Yield, and Clinical Outcomes From a Nationwide Dataset

Savanna Thor, Peter Lymberopoulos, Madia Ahad, Anwar Uddin, Rahat Uddin
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic immune-mediated enteropathy that may warrant advanced small bowel evaluation in cases of refractory symptoms, alarm features, or suspected malignancy. Enteroscopy enables deep small bowel visualization and tissue diagnosis but is infrequently performed during hospitalization. Despite its utility, data on its inpatient use, diagnostic yield, and associated outcomes are limited. This study examined national trends, diagnostic performance, and short-term clinical outcomes of inpatient enteroscopy in hospitalized CD patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adult CD hospitalizations in HCUP-NIS (2016–2020). CD and enteroscopy were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-CM code K90.0 and ICD-10-PCS codes, respectively. Primary outcomes: in-hospital mortality, LOS, and cost. Secondary outcomes: GIST, small bowel adenocarcinoma, and complications (bleeding, pancreatitis, ileus). Survey-weighted multivariable models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR), rate ratios, and costs, adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance, Charlson index, and hospital factors. Results: Among 190,235 CD hospitalizations (2016–2020), only 55 (0.03%) involved inpatient enteroscopy, with no significant change in utilization over time (P = 0.7). Enteroscopy was associated with significantly longer LOS (13.6 ± 3.5 vs 4.6 ± 0.03 days; aRR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.45–4.12; P < 0.001) and higher hospitalization costs ($42,242 vs $14,156; aRR 2.74, 95% CI: 1.38–5.47; P = 0.004). In-hospital mortality was numerically higher (9.1% vs 1.4%) but not statistically significant (aOR 4.1, 95% CI: 0.36–46.7; P = 0.3). Diagnostic yield was notably elevated: small bowel adenocarcinoma and GIST were detected in 14.5% and 12.7% of enteroscopy patients vs 0.09% and 0.03% in controls (aOR 61.2 and 79.3; both P < 0.001). No major complications occurred. These findings suggest inpatient enteroscopy, though rarely used, is highly effective for malignancy detection in high-risk CD cases without observed harm. Conclusion: Inpatient enteroscopy is infrequently used in hospitalized celiac disease patients but is strongly associated with increased diagnostic yield for small bowel malignancies and higher resource utilization. These findings support its targeted use in selected high-risk populations and underscore the need for prospective studies to refine its inpatient role, optimize timing, and guide clinical decision-making.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.