Instructional and Assessment Practices Used in Chemistry Courses at Two-Year Institutions: Results of a National Survey

Studies on the teaching and learning of chemistry at two-year institutions are sparse compared to studies at four-year institutions. Two-year institutions, though, serve a sizable number of students taking chemistry courses that eventually enter the workforce directly or seek advanced studies at four-year institutions. There is little understanding of the instructional and assessment practices enacted at two-year institutions compared to peer-reviewed studies on the instructional and assessment practices at four-year institutions. Our work in this study provides a starting point for understanding such practices. A national survey was administered to faculty members at two-year postsecondary institutions in the United States with a focus on three key chemistry courses: general chemistry, organic chemistry, and general-organic-biochemistry (GOB). Descriptive statistics are provided for discussing the use of instructional and assessment practices and their implications for teaching and learning. We found that instructional and assessment practices used by two-year institutions mirror those used by four-year institutions: for example, lecture-based instruction and summative assessment predominate enacted practices. Results of our work suggest there is an opportunity to reflect on the practices used in chemistry course contexts at two-year institutions and a call for increasing collaboration between two-year and four-year institutions to best support students across all postsecondary chemistry courses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01148
Primary Topic
Various Chemistry Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instructional and Assessment Practices Used in Chemistry Courses at Two-Year Institutions: Results of a National Survey

Megan C. Connor, Jeffrey R. Raker, Kendall M. Zammit
Journal of Chemical Education
Various Chemistry Research Topics
article

Instructional and Assessment Practices Used in Chemistry Courses at Two-Year Institutions: Results of a National Survey

Megan C. Connor, Jeffrey R. Raker, Kendall M. Zammit
article en

Abstract

Studies on the teaching and learning of chemistry at two-year institutions are sparse compared to studies at four-year institutions. Two-year institutions, though, serve a sizable number of students taking chemistry courses that eventually enter the workforce directly or seek advanced studies at four-year institutions. There is little understanding of the instructional and assessment practices enacted at two-year institutions compared to peer-reviewed studies on the instructional and assessment practices at four-year institutions. Our work in this study provides a starting point for understanding such practices. A national survey was administered to faculty members at two-year postsecondary institutions in the United States with a focus on three key chemistry courses: general chemistry, organic chemistry, and general-organic-biochemistry (GOB). Descriptive statistics are provided for discussing the use of instructional and assessment practices and their implications for teaching and learning. We found that instructional and assessment practices used by two-year institutions mirror those used by four-year institutions: for example, lecture-based instruction and summative assessment predominate enacted practices. Results of our work suggest there is an opportunity to reflect on the practices used in chemistry course contexts at two-year institutions and a call for increasing collaboration between two-year and four-year institutions to best support students across all postsecondary chemistry courses.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 103(1)
University of South Florida (US), Samford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Various Chemistry Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.