Stratified support: shadow education and maths achievement in East Asia’s six top-performing jurisdictions

We examine how shadow education is associated with educational inequality and mathematics achievement in six top-performing East Asian jurisdictions: Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Japan, Macao, Singapore, and South Korea. Using multilevel logistic and linear modelling on 2022 PISA data, we analyse the prevalence, socioeconomic stratification, and differential effects of five tutoring modes: one-to-one, internet/computer-based, asynchronous video instruction, small-group, and large-group tutoring. Access to traditional tutoring remains highly SES-dependent, whereas internet- or computer-based tutoring are the most democratised. Asynchronous video instruction appears particularly effective in Singapore, potentially due to high-quality English-language digital resources. Group-based tutoring is positively associated with mathematics in South Korea and Chinese Taipei, while one-to-one tutoring is generally linked to lower outcomes, suggesting a remedial role. We conclude that the role of shadow education modalities differs by jurisdiction. We discuss how shadow education reproduces inequality and recommend that future studies assess students’ use of AI for academic support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2025.2596164
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stratified support: shadow education and maths achievement in East Asia’s six top-performing jurisdictions

Matthew Courtney, George Leckie, Alisher Tlessov
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

Stratified support: shadow education and maths achievement in East Asia’s six top-performing jurisdictions

Matthew Courtney, George Leckie, Alisher Tlessov
article en

Abstract

We examine how shadow education is associated with educational inequality and mathematics achievement in six top-performing East Asian jurisdictions: Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Japan, Macao, Singapore, and South Korea. Using multilevel logistic and linear modelling on 2022 PISA data, we analyse the prevalence, socioeconomic stratification, and differential effects of five tutoring modes: one-to-one, internet/computer-based, asynchronous video instruction, small-group, and large-group tutoring. Access to traditional tutoring remains highly SES-dependent, whereas internet- or computer-based tutoring are the most democratised. Asynchronous video instruction appears particularly effective in Singapore, potentially due to high-quality English-language digital resources. Group-based tutoring is positively associated with mathematics in South Korea and Chinese Taipei, while one-to-one tutoring is generally linked to lower outcomes, suggesting a remedial role. We conclude that the role of shadow education modalities differs by jurisdiction. We discuss how shadow education reproduces inequality and recommend that future studies assess students’ use of AI for academic support.

British Journal of Sociology of Education
University of Bristol (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.