Impact of Different DOACs on Complications of TBI After Low-Energy Trauma

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used, robust evidence for low-energy trauma is scarce. Studies have shown similar or better outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) under DOAC therapy compared to vitamin K antagonists, but there is limited data on the differences among DOAC types. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective study of TBI patients with pre-injury DOACs who presented to our level 1 trauma unit and received cranial computed tomography. Only low-energy trauma mechanisms were included. <b>Results:</b> We included 643 patients with an average age of 82 years. As per the Glasgow Coma Scale, 637 patients (99.1%) had a mild TBI and 34 patients (5.3%) had intracranial hematomas. No delayed intracranial bleeding occurred during in-hospital observation. Rivaroxaban was the most frequent DOAC (278, 43.2%), followed by apixaban (221, 34.4%), dabigatran (84, 13.1%), and edoxaban (60, 9.3%). Neurosurgical interventions were performed in three cases (0.5%). The head injury-related in-hospital mortality was 0.9% (six patients). Fisher's Exact Test and regression analysis did not demonstrate statistically significant differences among the DOAC types regarding occurrence of intracranial bleeding, surgical interventions, or mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> We found no statistically significant differences between DOACs regarding complications of TBI after low-energy trauma. This study shows an overall low risk of complications after low-energy trauma in a predominantly geriatric population with TBI and DOAC therapy.