Contestation in artificial intelligence as a practice: from a system-centered perspective of contestability toward normative contextualization, situative critique and organizational culture

The mainstreaming of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in technologies of various application fields offers many opportunities, but also comes with a number of risks for data subjects, users, developers, intermediaries and other stakeholders. This includes, among other things, risks posed by technical unreliability, epistemic opacity, privacy intrusions and algorithmic discrimination. As a consequence, scholars of various academic disciplines have proposed contestability as a concept and design principle that supports stakeholders in challenging and possibly correcting the adverse effects caused by certain AI systems. Most of the academic work in this context has been carried out by scholars of Human–Computer-Interaction, Design Research and Public Law. Building on this important work, we discuss a number of exemplary practices and aspects that should, in our opinion, be considered within the scientific study of AI contestation. Moreover, we propose a shift in attention from system-specific features and mechanisms toward a stronger consideration of motivations for contestations, of critical practices in organizations and of a contextualization within legal regulatory regimes. This includes anticipating risks and effective means for contestation, co-creating among stakeholders, formalizing the translation from principles to practices for AI contestability, governing contestation in deployed systems, facilitating a culture for contestation, rejecting AI as well as enabling external oversight and critical monitoring. These conceptual considerations will hopefully facilitate further research and empirical investigations on AI contestability in social science fields such as organizational studies, communication studies, science & technology studies and law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1638257
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contestation in artificial intelligence as a practice: from a system-centered perspective of contestability toward normative contextualization, situative critique and organizational culture

Simon David Hirsbrunner, Steven Kleemann, Milan Tahraoui
Frontiers in Communication
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Contestation in artificial intelligence as a practice: from a system-centered perspective of contestability toward normative contextualization, situative critique and organizational culture

Simon David Hirsbrunner, Steven Kleemann, Milan Tahraoui
article en

Abstract

The mainstreaming of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in technologies of various application fields offers many opportunities, but also comes with a number of risks for data subjects, users, developers, intermediaries and other stakeholders. This includes, among other things, risks posed by technical unreliability, epistemic opacity, privacy intrusions and algorithmic discrimination. As a consequence, scholars of various academic disciplines have proposed contestability as a concept and design principle that supports stakeholders in challenging and possibly correcting the adverse effects caused by certain AI systems. Most of the academic work in this context has been carried out by scholars of Human–Computer-Interaction, Design Research and Public Law. Building on this important work, we discuss a number of exemplary practices and aspects that should, in our opinion, be considered within the scientific study of AI contestation. Moreover, we propose a shift in attention from system-specific features and mechanisms toward a stronger consideration of motivations for contestations, of critical practices in organizations and of a contextualization within legal regulatory regimes. This includes anticipating risks and effective means for contestation, co-creating among stakeholders, formalizing the translation from principles to practices for AI contestability, governing contestation in deployed systems, facilitating a culture for contestation, rejecting AI as well as enabling external oversight and critical monitoring. These conceptual considerations will hopefully facilitate further research and empirical investigations on AI contestability in social science fields such as organizational studies, communication studies, science & technology studies and law.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
University of Potsdam (DE), Berlin School of Economics and Law (DE), Centre Marc Bloch (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.