Three-Dimensional Soil-Arching Model for Predicting Earth Pressure on Buried Pipelines under Localized Subsidence

Localized foundation subsidence can lead to catastrophic failure of adjacent buried pipelines, severely compromising their serviceability. As a common cause of municipal pipeline damage, localized subsidence remains insufficiently understood, particularly in terms of the load-transfer mechanisms and stress-redistribution patterns in the surrounding soil and pipeline structure. In pipeline design, the earth pressure within the subsidence zone is a key design parameter. However, the combined influence of size effects and complex pipe-soil interaction makes classical theories inadequate for accurately predicting earth pressure, resulting in considerable discrepancies between theoretical and measured values. To overcome these limitations, this study systematically investigates the stress-redistribution mechanisms induced by localized subsidence through analytical methods. A three-dimensional soil-arching framework incorporating triaxial principal stress states is developed, accompanied by three geometric models—upward-convex, saddle-shaped, and downward-concave—to evaluate loading under different geotechnical conditions. Comparative validation against experimental data demonstrates that the proposed method effectively captures boundary load-transfer characteristics and size effects. The results indicate that the model, by fully accounting for the spatial distribution of the three principal stresses, offers superior predictive capability for load transfer under both plane-strain and three-dimensional conditions. The calculated soil-arching ratios agree well with experimental observations, confirming the validity of the proposed approach and its improvement over traditional methods in analyzing load redistribution caused by localized foundation subsidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100424
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-Dimensional Soil-Arching Model for Predicting Earth Pressure on Buried Pipelines under Localized Subsidence

Gang Cai, Fuquan Chen, Xiang Lü, Dao-liang Lai
Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Three-Dimensional Soil-Arching Model for Predicting Earth Pressure on Buried Pipelines under Localized Subsidence

Gang Cai, Fuquan Chen, Xiang Lü, Dao-liang Lai
article en

Abstract

Localized foundation subsidence can lead to catastrophic failure of adjacent buried pipelines, severely compromising their serviceability. As a common cause of municipal pipeline damage, localized subsidence remains insufficiently understood, particularly in terms of the load-transfer mechanisms and stress-redistribution patterns in the surrounding soil and pipeline structure. In pipeline design, the earth pressure within the subsidence zone is a key design parameter. However, the combined influence of size effects and complex pipe-soil interaction makes classical theories inadequate for accurately predicting earth pressure, resulting in considerable discrepancies between theoretical and measured values. To overcome these limitations, this study systematically investigates the stress-redistribution mechanisms induced by localized subsidence through analytical methods. A three-dimensional soil-arching framework incorporating triaxial principal stress states is developed, accompanied by three geometric models—upward-convex, saddle-shaped, and downward-concave—to evaluate loading under different geotechnical conditions. Comparative validation against experimental data demonstrates that the proposed method effectively captures boundary load-transfer characteristics and size effects. The results indicate that the model, by fully accounting for the spatial distribution of the three principal stresses, offers superior predictive capability for load transfer under both plane-strain and three-dimensional conditions. The calculated soil-arching ratios agree well with experimental observations, confirming the validity of the proposed approach and its improvement over traditional methods in analyzing load redistribution caused by localized foundation subsidence.

Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering
Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.