Restoration of Sagittal Alignment as a Key Factor in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Postoperative Balanced and Imbalanced Cases

Introduction The current consensus for treating sagittal imbalance in degenerative spine disease supports deformity correction. However, there is a growing trend toward limited fusion, particularly in patients presenting predominantly with leg symptoms. The present study aimed to compare radiological and clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion between patients with postoperative sagittal balance and those with residual imbalance. Methods This study included 270 patients who underwent limited lumbar arthrodesis and were followed for two years. Radiological parameters-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS)-were recorded preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative sagittal alignment: balanced (SVA < 50 mm) and imbalanced (SVA > 50 mm). Both intragroup pre- and postoperative improvements and intergroup differences in outcomes were analyzed. Results Out of 270 patients, 194 had good sagittal alignment and 76 had sagittal imbalance (SVA > 50 mm). Both groups showed significant postoperative (two-year follow-up) improvement in quality-of-life scores (VAS, ODI, and SF-36) compared with baseline values (p < 0.001). However, when comparing the degree of improvement between the balanced and imbalanced groups, no statistically significant differences were observed. A significant but weak negative correlation was noted between the change in the VAS score and the socioeconomic status in patients with sagittal imbalance of the spine. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, limited lumbar fusion can achieve favorable short-term outcomes irrespective of postoperative sagittal alignment. These findings suggest that extensive deformity correction may not always be necessary in degenerative cases presenting primarily with leg symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98975
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoration of Sagittal Alignment as a Key Factor in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Postoperative Balanced and Imbalanced Cases

Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Bharat R. Dave, Ajay Krishnan, Shivanand Mayi et al.
Cureus
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Restoration of Sagittal Alignment as a Key Factor in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Postoperative Balanced and Imbalanced Cases

Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Bharat R. Dave, Ajay Krishnan, Shivanand Mayi, Mirant B Dave, Abhijith Anil, Ravi Ranjan, Mikeson Panthackel, M.P. Sagar, S. Kulkarni, Arjit Vashishtha, Yogenkumar Adodariya
article en

Abstract

Introduction The current consensus for treating sagittal imbalance in degenerative spine disease supports deformity correction. However, there is a growing trend toward limited fusion, particularly in patients presenting predominantly with leg symptoms. The present study aimed to compare radiological and clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion between patients with postoperative sagittal balance and those with residual imbalance. Methods This study included 270 patients who underwent limited lumbar arthrodesis and were followed for two years. Radiological parameters-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS)-were recorded preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative sagittal alignment: balanced (SVA < 50 mm) and imbalanced (SVA > 50 mm). Both intragroup pre- and postoperative improvements and intergroup differences in outcomes were analyzed. Results Out of 270 patients, 194 had good sagittal alignment and 76 had sagittal imbalance (SVA > 50 mm). Both groups showed significant postoperative (two-year follow-up) improvement in quality-of-life scores (VAS, ODI, and SF-36) compared with baseline values (p < 0.001). However, when comparing the degree of improvement between the balanced and imbalanced groups, no statistically significant differences were observed. A significant but weak negative correlation was noted between the change in the VAS score and the socioeconomic status in patients with sagittal imbalance of the spine. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, limited lumbar fusion can achieve favorable short-term outcomes irrespective of postoperative sagittal alignment. These findings suggest that extensive deformity correction may not always be necessary in degenerative cases presenting primarily with leg symptoms.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Bhavnagar University (IN), University College of Medical Sciences (IN), Pushpagiri Medical College (IN), Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital (IN), Rabindranath Tagore Medical College (IN), Government Medical College Bhavnagar (IN), Mahatma Gandhi Mission Medical College and Hospital (IN), Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.