S2975 Pre-Procedure Colonoscopy and Endoscopy Videos Decrease No-Show Rates: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: Missed colonoscopy appointments remain a persistent barrier to timely colorectal cancer screening and procedural efficiency. No-shows disrupt clinic operations, delay diagnoses, and contribute to resource waste. A growing body of evidence supports the role of patient education in improving adherence to scheduled procedures. This study evaluates whether sending a pre-procedure educational video to patients can reduce the no-show rate for outpatient colonoscopy appointments in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at a gastroenterology practice comparing no-show rates before and after implementing a video-based educational intervention. In January 2025, prior to the intervention, no patients received educational videos. From February to April 2025, all patients scheduled for colonoscopy were sent a brief instructional video via text message, explaining the procedure, importance of bowel prep, and appointment expectations. Attendance data were collected from clinic records. No-show rates were calculated and compared between groups using a chi-square test for independence. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while values between 0.05 and 0.10 were interpreted as suggesting a possible trend. Results: In January 2025, 243 patients were scheduled. Of these, 228 (93.8%) attended and 15 (6.2%) were no-shows. During the intervention period (February–April), 1,180 patients were scheduled; 1,132 (95.9%) attended and 48 (4.1%) did not. The no-show rate decreased by 2.1 percentage points following the implementation of the video intervention. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (χ²(1) = 1.63, P = 0.20). Conclusion: While not statistically significant, the reduction in no-show rates following the educational video intervention suggests a decrease in no-show rates. The higher attendance during the video intervention period may reflect increased patient understanding, reassurance, or motivation to complete the procedure. Limitations include potential confounders not accounted for in this analysis, such as seasonal variation or changes in scheduling protocols. Future studies with larger sample sizes or randomized designs are warranted to assess the true impact of video-based education on procedural adherence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139360.22587.9e
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2975 Pre-Procedure Colonoscopy and Endoscopy Videos Decrease No-Show Rates: A Retrospective Study

Amy L. Tin, Dror Wasserman, Kevin Tin, Nathaly S. Leon
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S2975 Pre-Procedure Colonoscopy and Endoscopy Videos Decrease No-Show Rates: A Retrospective Study

Amy L. Tin, Dror Wasserman, Kevin Tin, Nathaly S. Leon
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Missed colonoscopy appointments remain a persistent barrier to timely colorectal cancer screening and procedural efficiency. No-shows disrupt clinic operations, delay diagnoses, and contribute to resource waste. A growing body of evidence supports the role of patient education in improving adherence to scheduled procedures. This study evaluates whether sending a pre-procedure educational video to patients can reduce the no-show rate for outpatient colonoscopy appointments in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at a gastroenterology practice comparing no-show rates before and after implementing a video-based educational intervention. In January 2025, prior to the intervention, no patients received educational videos. From February to April 2025, all patients scheduled for colonoscopy were sent a brief instructional video via text message, explaining the procedure, importance of bowel prep, and appointment expectations. Attendance data were collected from clinic records. No-show rates were calculated and compared between groups using a chi-square test for independence. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while values between 0.05 and 0.10 were interpreted as suggesting a possible trend. Results: In January 2025, 243 patients were scheduled. Of these, 228 (93.8%) attended and 15 (6.2%) were no-shows. During the intervention period (February–April), 1,180 patients were scheduled; 1,132 (95.9%) attended and 48 (4.1%) did not. The no-show rate decreased by 2.1 percentage points following the implementation of the video intervention. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (χ²(1) = 1.63, P = 0.20). Conclusion: While not statistically significant, the reduction in no-show rates following the educational video intervention suggests a decrease in no-show rates. The higher attendance during the video intervention period may reflect increased patient understanding, reassurance, or motivation to complete the procedure. Limitations include potential confounders not accounted for in this analysis, such as seasonal variation or changes in scheduling protocols. Future studies with larger sample sizes or randomized designs are warranted to assess the true impact of video-based education on procedural adherence.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.