S2989 Transforming the Gastroenterology Morbidity and Mortality Conference: A Multicenter, Fellow-Led Approach to Systems Thinking, Equity, and Safety Culture

Introduction: Modern patient safety (PS) culture emphasizes shared accountability and constructive assessment of adverse outcomes to improve care. Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) reviews are a major process to support this, but limited data exists on implementation in gastroenterology (GI). This gap highlights the need for resources to train gastroenterologists to recognize and address key PS drivers. Tools like the SBAR and Ottawa M&M Model (OM3) can be adopted to guide communication and productive error analysis to advance this aim. Methods: A structured, trainee-led M&M conference was implemented at 2 GI training programs: Institution 1 (I1) in 9/2021 and Institution 2 (I2) in 10/2024, with data collected through 5/2025. I1 captured complete case data through 6/2023 before transitioning to a maintenance phase focused on scale-up at I2. Pre-intervention M&Ms at both sites were unstructured and limited to procedural complications. Post-intervention, trainees met with QI-proficient mentors prior to presenting cases using standardized SBAR- and OM3-based models. Each case included an apparent cause analysis addressing systems factors, cognitive bias (CB), and social determinants of health (SDOH). Action items, division feedback, and outcomes were tracked. ACGME fellow surveys were reviewed for trends in PS culture. Results: Detailed review of 21 cases (I1: 12; I2: 9) confirmed 100% adherence to new format. I1 completed 16 additional cases after 6/2023 excluded from analysis. Both sites identified CB in ≥89% of cases and addressed all CB categories. SDOH were discussed in ≥83% of cases. All cases identified change opportunities and proposed interventions, with an implementation rate up to 48%. Post-intervention, fellows at both programs reported an absolute increase in PS event investigation participation, strengthened perceptions of personal responsibility for PS, and universal knowledge of how to report PS events by 2025. Conclusion: This multicenter implementation of a structured, trainee-led GI M&M conference shifted focus from procedural and individual errors to systems-based learning by addressing cognitive reasoning pitfalls, SDOH, and healthcare delivery flaws. The process was scalable and reproducible across 2 academic centers, led to measurable interventions to improve care quality and safety, and enhanced fellow engagement in safety culture. A structured M&M framework should be broadly implemented to promote patient safety and accountability in GI training programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139416.14335.bf
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2989 Transforming the Gastroenterology Morbidity and Mortality Conference: A Multicenter, Fellow-Led Approach to Systems Thinking, Equity, and Safety Culture

Ryan Flanagan, Kunal Jajoo, Samantha Magier, Michelle Hughes et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

S2989 Transforming the Gastroenterology Morbidity and Mortality Conference: A Multicenter, Fellow-Led Approach to Systems Thinking, Equity, and Safety Culture

Ryan Flanagan, Kunal Jajoo, Samantha Magier, Michelle Hughes, Daniel J. Stein
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Modern patient safety (PS) culture emphasizes shared accountability and constructive assessment of adverse outcomes to improve care. Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) reviews are a major process to support this, but limited data exists on implementation in gastroenterology (GI). This gap highlights the need for resources to train gastroenterologists to recognize and address key PS drivers. Tools like the SBAR and Ottawa M&M Model (OM3) can be adopted to guide communication and productive error analysis to advance this aim. Methods: A structured, trainee-led M&M conference was implemented at 2 GI training programs: Institution 1 (I1) in 9/2021 and Institution 2 (I2) in 10/2024, with data collected through 5/2025. I1 captured complete case data through 6/2023 before transitioning to a maintenance phase focused on scale-up at I2. Pre-intervention M&Ms at both sites were unstructured and limited to procedural complications. Post-intervention, trainees met with QI-proficient mentors prior to presenting cases using standardized SBAR- and OM3-based models. Each case included an apparent cause analysis addressing systems factors, cognitive bias (CB), and social determinants of health (SDOH). Action items, division feedback, and outcomes were tracked. ACGME fellow surveys were reviewed for trends in PS culture. Results: Detailed review of 21 cases (I1: 12; I2: 9) confirmed 100% adherence to new format. I1 completed 16 additional cases after 6/2023 excluded from analysis. Both sites identified CB in ≥89% of cases and addressed all CB categories. SDOH were discussed in ≥83% of cases. All cases identified change opportunities and proposed interventions, with an implementation rate up to 48%. Post-intervention, fellows at both programs reported an absolute increase in PS event investigation participation, strengthened perceptions of personal responsibility for PS, and universal knowledge of how to report PS events by 2025. Conclusion: This multicenter implementation of a structured, trainee-led GI M&M conference shifted focus from procedural and individual errors to systems-based learning by addressing cognitive reasoning pitfalls, SDOH, and healthcare delivery flaws. The process was scalable and reproducible across 2 academic centers, led to measurable interventions to improve care quality and safety, and enhanced fellow engagement in safety culture. A structured M&M framework should be broadly implemented to promote patient safety and accountability in GI training programs.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.