S3008 Female Participation in Editorial Boards of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, and Surgery Journals

Introduction: Female representation is increasing across medical fields with approximately 21% of practicing gastroenterology (GI) as women. Editorial boards shape priorities in research, influence publication records, and strongly influence the career advancement of academic physicians and trainees. We aimed to evaluate the balance of male and female representation in top tier publications in the field of GI and compare this to general medicine and surgical fields where female representation ranges from 40% of internal medicine, 24% of general surgery, 6% orthopedics, and 85.2% in Ob/Gyn. We focused on specific leadership roles including Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor, and Senior Associate Editor, as well as the editorial board to assess gender representation in top medical publishing. Methods: Data was gathered from the website of journals with the highest impact factor across subspecialties and editors were sorted into categories based on their titles—Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor, Senior Associate Editor, Associate Editor, and editorial board. Percentages of women in each category was assessed and compared across specialty journals using nonparametric testing. Results: We found that most GI journals had more male editors than female editors, especially in leadership roles. Among top GI journals, 16.67% (1/6) of editors in chief and 26.32% (5/19) of the senior editorial teams were women. Editorial boards were balanced with 50.2% women. In top internal medicine journals, 0/2 editors in chief and 59% (13/22) of other editorial leadership positions were women. Among the surgical journals, 50% (2/4) of editors in chief and 41.7% (10/24) of senior editors were women. In analysis, there is a significant difference between representation at the level of editors in chief (P < 0.001), senior editor positions (P = 0.01), but not at the level of the editorial board (P = 0.62) or overall (P = 0.83). Conclusion: Despite increasing numbers of women in gastroenterology, men still hold most of the top editorial jobs in gastroenterology journals. Internal medicine journals and surgical journals both have higher percentages of women in senior editor positions. At the level of the editorial board, representation is more balanced and does not differ between specialties. Intentionality in selection of editorial board members can help improve this balance in the Gastroenterology field.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139492.41634.60
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3008 Female Participation in Editorial Boards of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, and Surgery Journals

Xiaojing Wang, Anisha Nachnani
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

S3008 Female Participation in Editorial Boards of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, and Surgery Journals

Xiaojing Wang, Anisha Nachnani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Female representation is increasing across medical fields with approximately 21% of practicing gastroenterology (GI) as women. Editorial boards shape priorities in research, influence publication records, and strongly influence the career advancement of academic physicians and trainees. We aimed to evaluate the balance of male and female representation in top tier publications in the field of GI and compare this to general medicine and surgical fields where female representation ranges from 40% of internal medicine, 24% of general surgery, 6% orthopedics, and 85.2% in Ob/Gyn. We focused on specific leadership roles including Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor, and Senior Associate Editor, as well as the editorial board to assess gender representation in top medical publishing. Methods: Data was gathered from the website of journals with the highest impact factor across subspecialties and editors were sorted into categories based on their titles—Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor, Senior Associate Editor, Associate Editor, and editorial board. Percentages of women in each category was assessed and compared across specialty journals using nonparametric testing. Results: We found that most GI journals had more male editors than female editors, especially in leadership roles. Among top GI journals, 16.67% (1/6) of editors in chief and 26.32% (5/19) of the senior editorial teams were women. Editorial boards were balanced with 50.2% women. In top internal medicine journals, 0/2 editors in chief and 59% (13/22) of other editorial leadership positions were women. Among the surgical journals, 50% (2/4) of editors in chief and 41.7% (10/24) of senior editors were women. In analysis, there is a significant difference between representation at the level of editors in chief (P < 0.001), senior editor positions (P = 0.01), but not at the level of the editorial board (P = 0.62) or overall (P = 0.83). Conclusion: Despite increasing numbers of women in gastroenterology, men still hold most of the top editorial jobs in gastroenterology journals. Internal medicine journals and surgical journals both have higher percentages of women in senior editor positions. At the level of the editorial board, representation is more balanced and does not differ between specialties. Intentionality in selection of editorial board members can help improve this balance in the Gastroenterology field.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.