S2790 A Meta-Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treatments for MASLD

Introduction: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is characterized by the accumulation of fat and inflammation in the liver. It is rapidly increasing in frequency along with obesity and metabolic dysfunction and is becoming a common etiology of cirrhosis and liver transplantation. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at elevated risk for development of MASLD and liver fibrosis. T2DM treatments are thought to improve MASLD by reducing insulin sensitivity and promoting weight loss and reduced adipose tissue thereby reducing hepatic fat. This meta-analysis examines SGLT-2 and GLP-1 treatments for fibrosis reduction in patients with MASLD. Methods: A literature search using PubMed was performed for randomized control trials involving adult T2DM treatments using SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists for the treatment of MASLD from 2015-2024. Studies were included if they examined improvement in liver fibrosis staging by biopsy or advanced imaging. Studies measuring fibrosis by laboratory indices were excluded. Odds ratio calculations and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess fibrosis reduction in each study. In addition to I2 calculation, fixed and random effects models were applied to evaluate data heterogeneity. Results: Heterogeneity of fibrosis data was low with I2 of 0% and significant fixed and random effects models (P < 0.001). Out of the 7 trials only Takahashi et al. (ipragliflozin) and Loomba et al. (tirzepatide) displayed significant fibrosis reduction (P < 0.05). There was significant variability as evidenced by the size of the confidence intervals in several trials. Conclusion: Only 2 of 7 trials found significant reductions in liver fibrosis for patients. Variation in these results may be due to factors including limited populations in biopsy-proven MASLD trials in addition to dosage differences in the medications used. Population differences are also possible but likely non-contributory in the setting of low data heterogeneity. Despite only 2 significant trials, fixed and random effects models demonstrate these medications significantly reduce fibrosis on average. The data suggests that tirzepatide is superior to other GLP-1 medications which may be the result of its unique action as a dual GLP and GIP agonist leading to increased weight loss. In addition, ipragliflozin may have greater effects on adipose reduction than tofogliflozin as suggested by the trial outcomes. Although further large-scale studies are needed, these results are encouraging for the future of T2DM medications as MASLD treatments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138620.38612.9c
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2790 A Meta-Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treatments for MASLD

Xavier Zonna, Nguyễn Thị Nga, Conor Banta
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2790 A Meta-Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treatments for MASLD

Xavier Zonna, Nguyễn Thị Nga, Conor Banta
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is characterized by the accumulation of fat and inflammation in the liver. It is rapidly increasing in frequency along with obesity and metabolic dysfunction and is becoming a common etiology of cirrhosis and liver transplantation. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at elevated risk for development of MASLD and liver fibrosis. T2DM treatments are thought to improve MASLD by reducing insulin sensitivity and promoting weight loss and reduced adipose tissue thereby reducing hepatic fat. This meta-analysis examines SGLT-2 and GLP-1 treatments for fibrosis reduction in patients with MASLD. Methods: A literature search using PubMed was performed for randomized control trials involving adult T2DM treatments using SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists for the treatment of MASLD from 2015-2024. Studies were included if they examined improvement in liver fibrosis staging by biopsy or advanced imaging. Studies measuring fibrosis by laboratory indices were excluded. Odds ratio calculations and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess fibrosis reduction in each study. In addition to I2 calculation, fixed and random effects models were applied to evaluate data heterogeneity. Results: Heterogeneity of fibrosis data was low with I2 of 0% and significant fixed and random effects models (P < 0.001). Out of the 7 trials only Takahashi et al. (ipragliflozin) and Loomba et al. (tirzepatide) displayed significant fibrosis reduction (P < 0.05). There was significant variability as evidenced by the size of the confidence intervals in several trials. Conclusion: Only 2 of 7 trials found significant reductions in liver fibrosis for patients. Variation in these results may be due to factors including limited populations in biopsy-proven MASLD trials in addition to dosage differences in the medications used. Population differences are also possible but likely non-contributory in the setting of low data heterogeneity. Despite only 2 significant trials, fixed and random effects models demonstrate these medications significantly reduce fibrosis on average. The data suggests that tirzepatide is superior to other GLP-1 medications which may be the result of its unique action as a dual GLP and GIP agonist leading to increased weight loss. In addition, ipragliflozin may have greater effects on adipose reduction than tofogliflozin as suggested by the trial outcomes. Although further large-scale studies are needed, these results are encouraging for the future of T2DM medications as MASLD treatments.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.