S2791 Examining Prognostic Factors in Patients With Acute Liver Failure Secondary to DRESS Syndrome

Introduction: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) is a severe medication reaction characterized by eosinophilia, rash, and organ dysfunction. Although uncommon, liver injury secondary to DRESS can be severe, with acute liver failure (ALF) secondary to DRESS comprising a sizable number of transplants. However, little is known about prognostic factors that impact recovery in patients with DRESS and ALF. Methods: A literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted for case reports of adult DRESS complicated by ALF and 43 patients were chosen. Patients were separated into recovery or non-recovery (transplant/death) groups. Laboratory values, demographics, and management were analyzed. Two tailed T-testing and Incidence rate ratios were used to determine significance of differences between groups (P < 0.05). Results: Standard deviations indicated high data variability. There were no significant differences between characteristics or initial lab values between groups (P > 0.05). Non-recovery patients had significantly higher rates of multiorgan failure (P < 0.05) but not viral reactivation. Seven patients received transplants and 4 were successful. The most common secondary organ failure was renal failure with no difference between groups. Most common causes of death included multiorgan failure, sepsis, and cardiac arrest. No differences in treatments including steroid use were observed between groups. Conclusion: No significant difference in laboratory values or characteristics were seen suggesting that prognostication in this patient population is challenging. No difference was seen in steroid usage which is suggesting this may not impact mortality or need for transplant. No difference was seen in viral reactivation suggesting that this is not a reliable prognostic factor. Similar renal failure rates between groups indicate a relationship with liver injury previously reported in DRESS.1 Only multiorgan failure significantly impacted recovery suggesting more progressive disease leading to poor outcomes in the non-recovery group for unknown reasons. We continue to have no prognostication tool for ALF in DRESS likely due to rarity resulting in limited power and coexisting confounding variables. However, this raises a need for close monitoring of clinical decompensation and future studies on this topic. Reference 1. Lee WM, Squires RH, Jr, Nyberg SL et al. Acute liver failure: Summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2008;47:1401–1415. doi: 10.1002/hep.22177.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138624.14094.07
Primary Topic
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2791 Examining Prognostic Factors in Patients With Acute Liver Failure Secondary to DRESS Syndrome

Hoang Lan Nguyen, Xavier Zonna, Nariman Javaheri, Himaben Gohil et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
article

S2791 Examining Prognostic Factors in Patients With Acute Liver Failure Secondary to DRESS Syndrome

Hoang Lan Nguyen, Xavier Zonna, Nariman Javaheri, Himaben Gohil, Conor Banta
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) is a severe medication reaction characterized by eosinophilia, rash, and organ dysfunction. Although uncommon, liver injury secondary to DRESS can be severe, with acute liver failure (ALF) secondary to DRESS comprising a sizable number of transplants. However, little is known about prognostic factors that impact recovery in patients with DRESS and ALF. Methods: A literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted for case reports of adult DRESS complicated by ALF and 43 patients were chosen. Patients were separated into recovery or non-recovery (transplant/death) groups. Laboratory values, demographics, and management were analyzed. Two tailed T-testing and Incidence rate ratios were used to determine significance of differences between groups (P < 0.05). Results: Standard deviations indicated high data variability. There were no significant differences between characteristics or initial lab values between groups (P > 0.05). Non-recovery patients had significantly higher rates of multiorgan failure (P < 0.05) but not viral reactivation. Seven patients received transplants and 4 were successful. The most common secondary organ failure was renal failure with no difference between groups. Most common causes of death included multiorgan failure, sepsis, and cardiac arrest. No differences in treatments including steroid use were observed between groups. Conclusion: No significant difference in laboratory values or characteristics were seen suggesting that prognostication in this patient population is challenging. No difference was seen in steroid usage which is suggesting this may not impact mortality or need for transplant. No difference was seen in viral reactivation suggesting that this is not a reliable prognostic factor. Similar renal failure rates between groups indicate a relationship with liver injury previously reported in DRESS.1 Only multiorgan failure significantly impacted recovery suggesting more progressive disease leading to poor outcomes in the non-recovery group for unknown reasons. We continue to have no prognostication tool for ALF in DRESS likely due to rarity resulting in limited power and coexisting confounding variables. However, this raises a need for close monitoring of clinical decompensation and future studies on this topic. Reference 1. Lee WM, Squires RH, Jr, Nyberg SL et al. Acute liver failure: Summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2008;47:1401–1415. doi: 10.1002/hep.22177.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.