S2793 Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Obeticholic Acid Plus Ursodeoxycholic Acid Versus Ursodeoxycholic Acid Alone in Non-Cirrhotic Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Introduction: Clinical trials have indicated that obeticholic acid (OCA) increases pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and guidelines advise against its use in patients with cirrhosis due to potential hepatic safety concerns. Real-world data regarding OCA-associated pruritus and liver-related adverse outcomes remain limited. Thus, we aimed to examine the association of OCA use with pruritus and adverse liver-related outcomes in a real-world cohort of non-cirrhotic PBC patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study using the TriNetX database, comparing non-cirrhotic PBC patients treated with OCA plus ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, n = 666) versus UDCA alone (n = 666). Primary outcomes assessed over a 1-year period included the incidence of pruritus, jaundice, all-cause hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were reported using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Patients receiving OCA + UDCA had a significantly higher incidence of pruritus compared to those on UDCA monotherapy (8.4% vs 4.2%; RR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.29–3.11; P = 0.002). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of jaundice between groups (1.5% each; RR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.42–2.39; P = 1.000). Additionally, OCA + UDCA therapy was associated with significantly fewer hospitalizations than UDCA alone (4.1% vs 11.0%; RR 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24–0.57; P < 0.001). All-cause mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups (1.5% vs 2.4%; RR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.29–1.37; P = 0.235). Conclusion: This real-world analysis of non-cirrhotic PBC patients adds observational data indicating an increased association of pruritus with OCA use, aligning with previous clinical trial findings. No differences in jaundice or mortality were identified; however, OCA was associated with fewer hospitalizations. These results highlight the need for careful monitoring of pruritus and consideration of individual patient tolerability when prescribing OCA. Further prospective studies are necessary to better understand the hepatic safety profile of OCA in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138632.08978.87
Primary Topic
Liver Diseases and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2793 Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Obeticholic Acid Plus Ursodeoxycholic Acid Versus Ursodeoxycholic Acid Alone in Non-Cirrhotic Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Walid Hazem, Mohammad Alabbas, Omar T. Sims, Mohamad-Noor Abu-Hammour et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Diseases and Immunity
article

S2793 Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Obeticholic Acid Plus Ursodeoxycholic Acid Versus Ursodeoxycholic Acid Alone in Non-Cirrhotic Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Walid Hazem, Mohammad Alabbas, Omar T. Sims, Mohamad-Noor Abu-Hammour, Barish Eren, Dian Chiang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical trials have indicated that obeticholic acid (OCA) increases pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and guidelines advise against its use in patients with cirrhosis due to potential hepatic safety concerns. Real-world data regarding OCA-associated pruritus and liver-related adverse outcomes remain limited. Thus, we aimed to examine the association of OCA use with pruritus and adverse liver-related outcomes in a real-world cohort of non-cirrhotic PBC patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study using the TriNetX database, comparing non-cirrhotic PBC patients treated with OCA plus ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, n = 666) versus UDCA alone (n = 666). Primary outcomes assessed over a 1-year period included the incidence of pruritus, jaundice, all-cause hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were reported using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Patients receiving OCA + UDCA had a significantly higher incidence of pruritus compared to those on UDCA monotherapy (8.4% vs 4.2%; RR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.29–3.11; P = 0.002). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of jaundice between groups (1.5% each; RR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.42–2.39; P = 1.000). Additionally, OCA + UDCA therapy was associated with significantly fewer hospitalizations than UDCA alone (4.1% vs 11.0%; RR 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24–0.57; P < 0.001). All-cause mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups (1.5% vs 2.4%; RR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.29–1.37; P = 0.235). Conclusion: This real-world analysis of non-cirrhotic PBC patients adds observational data indicating an increased association of pruritus with OCA use, aligning with previous clinical trial findings. No differences in jaundice or mortality were identified; however, OCA was associated with fewer hospitalizations. These results highlight the need for careful monitoring of pruritus and consideration of individual patient tolerability when prescribing OCA. Further prospective studies are necessary to better understand the hepatic safety profile of OCA in routine clinical practice.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Liver Diseases and Immunity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.