S2852 Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Liver Failure: A Time-Stratified Meta-Analysis Integrating Human Clinical Trials, In Vitro Studies, and Animal Models

Introduction: End-stage liver disease and acute liver failure patients have limited treatment options due to organ shortages and transplant complications. Mesenchymal stem cells show promising regenerative potential. This study analyzes time-dependent MSC outcomes using clinical trials, in-vitro studies, and animal models. Methods: The research team conducted systematic database searches across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, preprint servers and grey literature databases through May 2025 for all liver regenerative therapy studies including in vitro experiments and animal and clinical trials. A meta-analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of MSC therapy. A risk assessment for bias was performed while PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results: The animal experiments showed MSCs operated through immune regulation to eliminate fibrosis while enhancing both survival times and gene therapy approaches restored liver functions in targeted situations. The scaffold-based methods provided temporary liver functionality support to rodent and primate subjects during the short-term. The research conducted with iPSC-derived liver organoids in vitro showed that Wnt signaling and IL-6/STAT3 activation acted as essential pathways for regeneration. The clinical trial meta-analysis results showed MSCs reduced MELD scores by −0.32 (95% CI: −0.55 to −0.10) during the first 4 weeks and by −0.42 (95% CI: −0.82 to −0.02) during the 12-week period and by −0.91 (95% CI: −1.20 to −0.61) during the 24-week assessment but showed no effect at 48 weeks (0.13; 95% CI: −0.48 to 0.74). The pooled effect size was SMD −0.22 (95% CI: −0.33 to −0.12; P < 0.001; I² = 68.3%). The studies showed MSCs elevated albumin levels during all assessment periods extending from 2 weeks (SMD 0.81; 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.11) up to 48 weeks (0.46; 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.30). The combined results showed SMD 0.55 (95% CI: 0.37 to 0.73; P < 0.001; I² = 78.1%). The survival assessment demonstrated statistical significance only at the 48-week point (OR 1.29; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.60; P = 0.023; I² = 0.0%). Conclusion: This first time-stratified meta-analysis of MSC therapy in liver failure shows MELD and albumin gains (2–24 weeks) and survival benefits at 48 weeks. While generally safe, risks include immune reactions, thrombosis, and reduced efficacy over time. These findings warrant future trials with standardized protocols and adjunctive regenerative strategies to sustain therapeutic benefits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138868.78444.e0
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2852 Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Liver Failure: A Time-Stratified Meta-Analysis Integrating Human Clinical Trials, In Vitro Studies, and Animal Models

Muhammad Ali Khan, Giovannie Isaac-Coss, S. Chari, Meghana Kakarla et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

S2852 Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Liver Failure: A Time-Stratified Meta-Analysis Integrating Human Clinical Trials, In Vitro Studies, and Animal Models

Muhammad Ali Khan, Giovannie Isaac-Coss, S. Chari, Meghana Kakarla, Uchit Thapa, Venu Ganipisetti, Nilay Bhatt, Kashif Ali, A. Pillai, Vasanthi Panivel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: End-stage liver disease and acute liver failure patients have limited treatment options due to organ shortages and transplant complications. Mesenchymal stem cells show promising regenerative potential. This study analyzes time-dependent MSC outcomes using clinical trials, in-vitro studies, and animal models. Methods: The research team conducted systematic database searches across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, preprint servers and grey literature databases through May 2025 for all liver regenerative therapy studies including in vitro experiments and animal and clinical trials. A meta-analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of MSC therapy. A risk assessment for bias was performed while PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results: The animal experiments showed MSCs operated through immune regulation to eliminate fibrosis while enhancing both survival times and gene therapy approaches restored liver functions in targeted situations. The scaffold-based methods provided temporary liver functionality support to rodent and primate subjects during the short-term. The research conducted with iPSC-derived liver organoids in vitro showed that Wnt signaling and IL-6/STAT3 activation acted as essential pathways for regeneration. The clinical trial meta-analysis results showed MSCs reduced MELD scores by −0.32 (95% CI: −0.55 to −0.10) during the first 4 weeks and by −0.42 (95% CI: −0.82 to −0.02) during the 12-week period and by −0.91 (95% CI: −1.20 to −0.61) during the 24-week assessment but showed no effect at 48 weeks (0.13; 95% CI: −0.48 to 0.74). The pooled effect size was SMD −0.22 (95% CI: −0.33 to −0.12; P < 0.001; I² = 68.3%). The studies showed MSCs elevated albumin levels during all assessment periods extending from 2 weeks (SMD 0.81; 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.11) up to 48 weeks (0.46; 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.30). The combined results showed SMD 0.55 (95% CI: 0.37 to 0.73; P < 0.001; I² = 78.1%). The survival assessment demonstrated statistical significance only at the 48-week point (OR 1.29; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.60; P = 0.023; I² = 0.0%). Conclusion: This first time-stratified meta-analysis of MSC therapy in liver failure shows MELD and albumin gains (2–24 weeks) and survival benefits at 48 weeks. While generally safe, risks include immune reactions, thrombosis, and reduced efficacy over time. These findings warrant future trials with standardized protocols and adjunctive regenerative strategies to sustain therapeutic benefits.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.