S2855 From Fatty Liver to Fewer Tumors: GI Cancer Risk in MASLD After Bariatric Surgery

Introduction: MASLD affects ∼25% of adults globally and is increasingly linked to GI and liver cancers. In obese MASLD patients, evidence shows bariatric surgery improves liver histology and metabolism, but long-term cancer risk remains unclear. This study used national data to assess post-surgical cancer risk in this high-risk metabolic group. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2018–2021), identifying MASLD via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes (K76.0, K75.81). Bariatric surgery history was defined by Z98.84 and Z98.89, excluding those who underwent bariatric procedures during index hospitalization. GI/hepatobiliary cancers were identified using ICD-10 codes (C22.0, C18, C25, C15, C16). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, insurance, and income. Survey weights and clustering generated national estimates. Subgroup analysis was stratified by cancer type. Results: Of 454,054 MASLD hospital admissions from 2018–2021 included 11,602 patients (2.6%) who underwent bariatric surgery. The bariatric surgery group included more female patients (79.4% vs 52.7%) and patients who were younger (mean age 52.5 vs 56.0 years). Unadjusted analysis showed 52% lower odds of cancer in the bariatric group (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.40–0.58, P < 0.001), which remained significant after adjustment (aOR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59–0.87, P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly reduced odds of hepatocellular carcinoma (aOR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45–0.89, P = 0.008) and colon cancer (aOR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34–0.79, P = 0.002). No significant associations were observed for pancreatic (aOR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.59–1.43, P = 0.70), esophageal (aOR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.03–1.19, P = 0.08), or gastric cancers (aOR 1.42, 95% CI: 0.83–2.43, P = 0.20). Conclusion: This national study of hospitalized MASLD patients found that prior bariatric surgery was associated with significantly reduced odds of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers—particularly hepatocellular (aOR 0.63) and colorectal cancer (aOR 0.51). These findings align with known metabolic benefits of surgery, including improved insulin sensitivity, reduced inflammation, and microbiome changes. No significant associations were seen for pancreatic, gastric, or esophageal cancers, suggesting organ-specific effects. While causality cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design, results support bariatric surgery as a potential cancer-modifying intervention in high-risk metabolic populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138880.10944.0e
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2855 From Fatty Liver to Fewer Tumors: GI Cancer Risk in MASLD After Bariatric Surgery

Giovannie Isaac-Coss, Meghana Kakarla, Nancy S. Reau, A. Pillai
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2855 From Fatty Liver to Fewer Tumors: GI Cancer Risk in MASLD After Bariatric Surgery

Giovannie Isaac-Coss, Meghana Kakarla, Nancy S. Reau, A. Pillai
article en

Abstract

Introduction: MASLD affects ∼25% of adults globally and is increasingly linked to GI and liver cancers. In obese MASLD patients, evidence shows bariatric surgery improves liver histology and metabolism, but long-term cancer risk remains unclear. This study used national data to assess post-surgical cancer risk in this high-risk metabolic group. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2018–2021), identifying MASLD via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes (K76.0, K75.81). Bariatric surgery history was defined by Z98.84 and Z98.89, excluding those who underwent bariatric procedures during index hospitalization. GI/hepatobiliary cancers were identified using ICD-10 codes (C22.0, C18, C25, C15, C16). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, insurance, and income. Survey weights and clustering generated national estimates. Subgroup analysis was stratified by cancer type. Results: Of 454,054 MASLD hospital admissions from 2018–2021 included 11,602 patients (2.6%) who underwent bariatric surgery. The bariatric surgery group included more female patients (79.4% vs 52.7%) and patients who were younger (mean age 52.5 vs 56.0 years). Unadjusted analysis showed 52% lower odds of cancer in the bariatric group (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.40–0.58, P < 0.001), which remained significant after adjustment (aOR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59–0.87, P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly reduced odds of hepatocellular carcinoma (aOR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45–0.89, P = 0.008) and colon cancer (aOR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34–0.79, P = 0.002). No significant associations were observed for pancreatic (aOR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.59–1.43, P = 0.70), esophageal (aOR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.03–1.19, P = 0.08), or gastric cancers (aOR 1.42, 95% CI: 0.83–2.43, P = 0.20). Conclusion: This national study of hospitalized MASLD patients found that prior bariatric surgery was associated with significantly reduced odds of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers—particularly hepatocellular (aOR 0.63) and colorectal cancer (aOR 0.51). These findings align with known metabolic benefits of surgery, including improved insulin sensitivity, reduced inflammation, and microbiome changes. No significant associations were seen for pancreatic, gastric, or esophageal cancers, suggesting organ-specific effects. While causality cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design, results support bariatric surgery as a potential cancer-modifying intervention in high-risk metabolic populations.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.