ADNEX-AI: automated extraction of ultrasound predictors for interpretable ovarian cancer risk stratification

Accurate triage of ovarian masses is facilitated in many centers by the guideline-endorsed, extensively validated IOTA-ADNEX risk model, yet the model still relies on manual measurements of key tumor features. We developed ADNEX-AI, a multi-task deep-learning system that automatically segments four ADNEX ultrasound predictors - lesion, locules, solid tissue, papillary projections - and outputs their quantitative values. The network was trained on 816 annotated images from 369 consecutive women recruited at 11 centers (43% malignancies) and prospectively evaluated on a temporally separate cohort of 1088 patients scanned at 10 of those centers (8008 images; 35% malignancies). ADNEX-AI discriminated benign from malignant tumors with an AUC of 0.930 (95% CI 0.913-0.943), less than but close to examiner-derived ADNEX (0.945; 0.930-0.957; P = 0.004) while delivering better calibration and markedly lower inter-center variability. By removing manual caliper work yet preserving full interpretability, ADNEX-AI could extend high-quality ovarian-cancer risk stratification to clinics that lack specialized ultrasound expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Precision Oncology
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01215-x
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ADNEX-AI: automated extraction of ultrasound predictors for interpretable ovarian cancer risk stratification

D. Timmerman, Axel Geysels, A. C. Testa, E. Epstein et al.
npj Precision Oncology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

ADNEX-AI: automated extraction of ultrasound predictors for interpretable ovarian cancer risk stratification

D. Timmerman, Axel Geysels, A. C. Testa, E. Epstein, Tom Bourne, F. Moro, Yvette S. Groszmann, Marek Kudła, L. Valentin, G. Garofalo, P. Sladkevicius, Stefan Timmerman, L. Jokubkiene, Artur Czekierdowski, Matthew B. Blaschko, F. Buonomo, Jolien Ceusters, Wouter Froyman, Ben Van Calster, Bart De Moor, Caroline Van Holsbeke, Daniela Fischerová
article en

Abstract

Accurate triage of ovarian masses is facilitated in many centers by the guideline-endorsed, extensively validated IOTA-ADNEX risk model, yet the model still relies on manual measurements of key tumor features. We developed ADNEX-AI, a multi-task deep-learning system that automatically segments four ADNEX ultrasound predictors - lesion, locules, solid tissue, papillary projections - and outputs their quantitative values. The network was trained on 816 annotated images from 369 consecutive women recruited at 11 centers (43% malignancies) and prospectively evaluated on a temporally separate cohort of 1088 patients scanned at 10 of those centers (8008 images; 35% malignancies). ADNEX-AI discriminated benign from malignant tumors with an AUC of 0.930 (95% CI 0.913-0.943), less than but close to examiner-derived ADNEX (0.945; 0.930-0.957; P = 0.004) while delivering better calibration and markedly lower inter-center variability. By removing manual caliper work yet preserving full interpretability, ADNEX-AI could extend high-quality ovarian-cancer risk stratification to clinics that lack specialized ultrasound expertise.

npj Precision OncologyVol. 10(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Medical University of Lublin (PL), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Harvard University (US), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Lund University (SE), Charles University (CZ), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE), Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (IT), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE), Imperial College London (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.