Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Air Quality: A Systematic Review of Methods and Challenges

Air quality prediction is a critical challenge amid rising environmental and health risks from pollution. This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) to compare traditional statistical models and machine learning (ML) techniques applied to air quality forecasting. Following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, 412 peer-reviewed articles (2016–2025) were analyzed using thematic filters and bibliometric tools. Results show a marked shift toward ML methods, particularly in Asia (73.2%), with limited representation from Latin America and Africa. Statistical models focused mainly on MLR (88.6%) and ARIMA (11.4%), while ML approaches (n = 574) included Random Forest, LSTM, and SVM. Only 12% of studies conducted direct comparisons. A total of 1177 predictor variables and 307 performance metrics were systematized, highlighting PM2.5, NO2, and RMSE. Hybrid models like CNN-LSTM show strong potential but face challenges in implementation and interpretability. This review proposes a consolidated framework to guide future research toward more explainable, adaptive, and context-aware predictive models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18120783
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Air Quality: A Systematic Review of Methods and Challenges

Teresa Guarda, Jairo R. Coronado-Hernández, Germán Herrera Vidal, Claudia Minnaard et al.
4 citations
Algorithms
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
3.20
article

Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Air Quality: A Systematic Review of Methods and Challenges

Teresa Guarda, Jairo R. Coronado-Hernández, Germán Herrera Vidal, Claudia Minnaard, Luzneyda Ballesteros Peinado
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Air quality prediction is a critical challenge amid rising environmental and health risks from pollution. This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) to compare traditional statistical models and machine learning (ML) techniques applied to air quality forecasting. Following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, 412 peer-reviewed articles (2016–2025) were analyzed using thematic filters and bibliometric tools. Results show a marked shift toward ML methods, particularly in Asia (73.2%), with limited representation from Latin America and Africa. Statistical models focused mainly on MLR (88.6%) and ARIMA (11.4%), while ML approaches (n = 574) included Random Forest, LSTM, and SVM. Only 12% of studies conducted direct comparisons. A total of 1177 predictor variables and 307 performance metrics were systematized, highlighting PM2.5, NO2, and RMSE. Hybrid models like CNN-LSTM show strong potential but face challenges in implementation and interpretability. This review proposes a consolidated framework to guide future research toward more explainable, adaptive, and context-aware predictive models.

AlgorithmsVol. 18(12)
National University of Lomas de Zamora (AR), Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena (EC), University of the Coast (CO), Fundación Universitaria Tecnológico Comfenalco Cartagena (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Air Quality: A Systematic Review of Methods and Challenges — Teresa Guarda, Jairo R. Coronado-Hernández, et al. · Algorithms (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS