S2842 A Multi-Stage Machine-Learning Pipeline for Early Detection, Severity Stratification, and Prognostic Forecasting in Liver Disease

Introduction: Liver disease remains a major global health burden, often progressing undetected until advanced stages. We applied supervised and unsupervised machine-learning techniques—including random forest classification, k-means clustering, and long short-term memory networks. Methods: We analyzed the Indian Liver Patient Dataset (583 records) containing age, gender, total and direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine and aspartate aminotransferases, total proteins, albumin, and albumin–globulin ratio. We imputed missing albumin–globulin values with the mean, encoded gender numerically, and created interaction features (age × bilirubin, gender × alkaline phosphatase). We normalized all continuous variables and split the data into 80 percent training and 20 percent testing sets. A random forest classifier distinguished disease-positive from disease-negative cases. To infer severity without predefined labels, we applied k-means clustering (k = 3) on the normalized feature set and mapped each cluster to mild, moderate, or severe stages. We trained a second random forest on these inferred labels to predict severity for new patients. Finally, we generated synthetic 5-visit time-series data—spacing visits 30 days apart and adding Gaussian noise—and trained long short-term memory networks to forecast next-visit bilirubin values and severity stages based on the preceding 3 visits. Results: The disease classifier reached 81.2% accuracy on the held-out test set, with precision and recall both above 0.80 for the liver-disease class. Clustering yielded 3 subgroups of comparable size, each exhibiting distinct biochemical signatures. The severity classifier achieved 99.1% accuracy in assigning mild, moderate, or severe labels. The bilirubin-forecasting LSTM produced a mean absolute error of 1.07 mg/dL on the test set. The severity-forecasting LSTM achieved 96% overall accuracy and an F1-score of 0.92 for the severe category. These results demonstrate that combining machine-learning classification, unsupervised clustering, and sequence modeling can accurately detect liver disease, stratify its severity, and anticipate biomarker and stage progression. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the potential of combining classification, clustering, and sequence modeling to support timely diagnosis, personalized risk stratification, and proactive management in liver disease care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138828.50148.e7
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2842 A Multi-Stage Machine-Learning Pipeline for Early Detection, Severity Stratification, and Prognostic Forecasting in Liver Disease

Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota, C. David Mintz et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

S2842 A Multi-Stage Machine-Learning Pipeline for Early Detection, Severity Stratification, and Prognostic Forecasting in Liver Disease

Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota, C. David Mintz, Sachin Sravan Kumar Komati, Sarath Chandra Ponnada, Sai Lakshmi Prasanna Komati
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Liver disease remains a major global health burden, often progressing undetected until advanced stages. We applied supervised and unsupervised machine-learning techniques—including random forest classification, k-means clustering, and long short-term memory networks. Methods: We analyzed the Indian Liver Patient Dataset (583 records) containing age, gender, total and direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine and aspartate aminotransferases, total proteins, albumin, and albumin–globulin ratio. We imputed missing albumin–globulin values with the mean, encoded gender numerically, and created interaction features (age × bilirubin, gender × alkaline phosphatase). We normalized all continuous variables and split the data into 80 percent training and 20 percent testing sets. A random forest classifier distinguished disease-positive from disease-negative cases. To infer severity without predefined labels, we applied k-means clustering (k = 3) on the normalized feature set and mapped each cluster to mild, moderate, or severe stages. We trained a second random forest on these inferred labels to predict severity for new patients. Finally, we generated synthetic 5-visit time-series data—spacing visits 30 days apart and adding Gaussian noise—and trained long short-term memory networks to forecast next-visit bilirubin values and severity stages based on the preceding 3 visits. Results: The disease classifier reached 81.2% accuracy on the held-out test set, with precision and recall both above 0.80 for the liver-disease class. Clustering yielded 3 subgroups of comparable size, each exhibiting distinct biochemical signatures. The severity classifier achieved 99.1% accuracy in assigning mild, moderate, or severe labels. The bilirubin-forecasting LSTM produced a mean absolute error of 1.07 mg/dL on the test set. The severity-forecasting LSTM achieved 96% overall accuracy and an F1-score of 0.92 for the severe category. These results demonstrate that combining machine-learning classification, unsupervised clustering, and sequence modeling can accurately detect liver disease, stratify its severity, and anticipate biomarker and stage progression. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the potential of combining classification, clustering, and sequence modeling to support timely diagnosis, personalized risk stratification, and proactive management in liver disease care.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.