S2872 Safety and Efficacy of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan + TNF-α for Advanced Liver Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Surgical intervention is the primary treatment for liver malignancy, but 2-thirds of patients are ineligible for resection. They are treated with Isolated Hepatic Perfusion (IHP), where high-dose chemotherapy, commonly Melphalan with TNF-α, is administered directly to the liver, limiting systemic toxicity. Techniques like Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) and Trans arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) are suboptimal for advanced tumor burdens. IHP is used at specialized centers, but minimal sample size and procedural complexity limit data. This is the first ever meta-analysis to assess the safety of IHP on tumor response, survival, and toxicity. Methods: A literature search from inception till April 2025 was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Non-randomized single-arm trials were screened. Eligible studies involved adults over 18 undergoing IHP with Melphalan + TNF-α for primary liver malignancies or secondary unresectable liver metastases. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were done using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro. Sensitivity analyses were done for outcomes with heterogeneity exceeding I² > 50. Results: Eight non-overlapping studies (155 patients) were included. For primary outcomes, partial response was seen in 56.7% (95% CI: 42.5%-69.9%, P < 0.001; I² = 54.8%), and complete response in 9.0% (95% CI: 2.1%-31.7%, P = 0.044; I² = 67.9%). Overall response rate was 66.2% (95% CI: 57.1%-74.2%, P = 0.341; I² = 11.6%). For secondary outcomes, grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity was less common 22.0% (95% CI: 12.0%-39.4%, P = 0.448; I² = 0%), while hepatic toxicity affected 69.1% (95% CI: 58.7%-77.8%, P = 0.568; I² = 0%). Mean hospital stay was 18.5 days (95% CI: 11.3–25.7, P < 0.0001; I² = 95%). Subgroup for tumor type (neuroendocrine vs non-neuroendocrine) and age group (≥55 vs <55) did not alter response or hepatic toxicity. Conclusion: IHP with Melphalan ± TNF-α shows moderate tumor response and promising survival in advanced liver malignancies but carries high hepatic toxicity and procedural burden. These findings offer direction, yet underline the urgent need for larger, controlled trials, to treat unresectable tumor metastasis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138948.98750.b1
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2872 Safety and Efficacy of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan + TNF-α for Advanced Liver Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Muhammad Junaid Ahsan, Mirha Ali, Khadija Mohib, Manahil Ahmed et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

S2872 Safety and Efficacy of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan + TNF-α for Advanced Liver Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Muhammad Junaid Ahsan, Mirha Ali, Khadija Mohib, Manahil Ahmed, Barka Sajid, Zainab Wahaj, Abu-Bakr Ahmed, S. Abbas, Reenal Fairy
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical intervention is the primary treatment for liver malignancy, but 2-thirds of patients are ineligible for resection. They are treated with Isolated Hepatic Perfusion (IHP), where high-dose chemotherapy, commonly Melphalan with TNF-α, is administered directly to the liver, limiting systemic toxicity. Techniques like Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) and Trans arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) are suboptimal for advanced tumor burdens. IHP is used at specialized centers, but minimal sample size and procedural complexity limit data. This is the first ever meta-analysis to assess the safety of IHP on tumor response, survival, and toxicity. Methods: A literature search from inception till April 2025 was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Non-randomized single-arm trials were screened. Eligible studies involved adults over 18 undergoing IHP with Melphalan + TNF-α for primary liver malignancies or secondary unresectable liver metastases. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were done using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro. Sensitivity analyses were done for outcomes with heterogeneity exceeding I² > 50. Results: Eight non-overlapping studies (155 patients) were included. For primary outcomes, partial response was seen in 56.7% (95% CI: 42.5%-69.9%, P < 0.001; I² = 54.8%), and complete response in 9.0% (95% CI: 2.1%-31.7%, P = 0.044; I² = 67.9%). Overall response rate was 66.2% (95% CI: 57.1%-74.2%, P = 0.341; I² = 11.6%). For secondary outcomes, grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity was less common 22.0% (95% CI: 12.0%-39.4%, P = 0.448; I² = 0%), while hepatic toxicity affected 69.1% (95% CI: 58.7%-77.8%, P = 0.568; I² = 0%). Mean hospital stay was 18.5 days (95% CI: 11.3–25.7, P < 0.0001; I² = 95%). Subgroup for tumor type (neuroendocrine vs non-neuroendocrine) and age group (≥55 vs <55) did not alter response or hepatic toxicity. Conclusion: IHP with Melphalan ± TNF-α shows moderate tumor response and promising survival in advanced liver malignancies but carries high hepatic toxicity and procedural burden. These findings offer direction, yet underline the urgent need for larger, controlled trials, to treat unresectable tumor metastasis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.