S2876 Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Compared to Acute Decompensation of Cirrhosis

Introduction: Acute On Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) is distinct clinical entity with high short-term mortality. Compared ACLF, acute decompensation of cirrhosis (AD) carries relatively lower short-term mortality due to less severe insult. Even though short-term mortality of these 2 conditions well documented, comparison of long-term outcome among these 2 conditions still not well established. Therefore, we did a retrospective observational study to compare long-term outcome of ACLF patients with AD as well as to identify the factors associated with unfavourable outcome. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 112 ACLF patients according to APASL criteria and 109 AD patients. Data collected included demographics, disease etiology, complications, blood counts, liver and renal function tests, serum lactate, hospital admissions, and mortality. Results: Among 221 patients, majority were man (87.8%) with a median age of 50 and alcohol was the most common etiology (50.7%). Upper GI bleed was the leading event in the AD group (67.2%, P < 0.001). One-year mortality was significantly higher in ACLF (41%, P < 0.001) than AD (11%, P < 0.001). Estimated mean survival was 326.94 days (±9.24) for AD and 222.36 days (±16.16, P < 0.001) for ACLF. In ACLF, the AARC grade-III subgroup had a lower mean survival (51.22 days) than grade-II (246.21 days), a significant difference (P < 0.001). Patients with CLIF-AD scores >60 had a mean survival of 293.11 days, slightly lower than 349.1 days for those scoring below 60. While the ACLF group had highest short term (30 days, 36.6%), mortality in AD was highest between 91-365 days. The area under the curve (AUC) for CLIF-ACLF >48.5 was 86% (sensitivity 84.8%, specificity 72.7%), and for CTP score >12.5 was 69.6% (sensitivity 52.2%, specificity 81.8%). CLIF-ACLF demonstrated superior prognostic discrimination compared to CTP (P = 0.005). Among AD patients, CTP, MELD and CLIFF-AD scores were similar in predicting long term outcomes. In ACLF patients AARC and ACLF-CLIFF scores showed trend towards better performance predicting the long-term outcomes. Conclusion: Alcohol is emerging as major etiology in both the group. Even though ACLF carries high short-term mortality, their long-term survival is slightly better than AD. Existing scores are not helpful in predicting long term outcome among ACLF patients, stressing the need for better score for these group of patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138964.32369.0f
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2876 Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Compared to Acute Decompensation of Cirrhosis

Ganesh Bhat, Dronamraju Sujay Prabhath, Shetty Aathish
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2876 Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Compared to Acute Decompensation of Cirrhosis

Ganesh Bhat, Dronamraju Sujay Prabhath, Shetty Aathish
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute On Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) is distinct clinical entity with high short-term mortality. Compared ACLF, acute decompensation of cirrhosis (AD) carries relatively lower short-term mortality due to less severe insult. Even though short-term mortality of these 2 conditions well documented, comparison of long-term outcome among these 2 conditions still not well established. Therefore, we did a retrospective observational study to compare long-term outcome of ACLF patients with AD as well as to identify the factors associated with unfavourable outcome. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 112 ACLF patients according to APASL criteria and 109 AD patients. Data collected included demographics, disease etiology, complications, blood counts, liver and renal function tests, serum lactate, hospital admissions, and mortality. Results: Among 221 patients, majority were man (87.8%) with a median age of 50 and alcohol was the most common etiology (50.7%). Upper GI bleed was the leading event in the AD group (67.2%, P < 0.001). One-year mortality was significantly higher in ACLF (41%, P < 0.001) than AD (11%, P < 0.001). Estimated mean survival was 326.94 days (±9.24) for AD and 222.36 days (±16.16, P < 0.001) for ACLF. In ACLF, the AARC grade-III subgroup had a lower mean survival (51.22 days) than grade-II (246.21 days), a significant difference (P < 0.001). Patients with CLIF-AD scores >60 had a mean survival of 293.11 days, slightly lower than 349.1 days for those scoring below 60. While the ACLF group had highest short term (30 days, 36.6%), mortality in AD was highest between 91-365 days. The area under the curve (AUC) for CLIF-ACLF >48.5 was 86% (sensitivity 84.8%, specificity 72.7%), and for CTP score >12.5 was 69.6% (sensitivity 52.2%, specificity 81.8%). CLIF-ACLF demonstrated superior prognostic discrimination compared to CTP (P = 0.005). Among AD patients, CTP, MELD and CLIFF-AD scores were similar in predicting long term outcomes. In ACLF patients AARC and ACLF-CLIFF scores showed trend towards better performance predicting the long-term outcomes. Conclusion: Alcohol is emerging as major etiology in both the group. Even though ACLF carries high short-term mortality, their long-term survival is slightly better than AD. Existing scores are not helpful in predicting long term outcome among ACLF patients, stressing the need for better score for these group of patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.