Gaps Between Policy and Practice: Outcomes and Supports of People With Disabilities Who Receive HCBS

The aim of this study was to examine the quality of life outcomes (personal outcomes) and person-centered supports of people with disabilities who receive Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS). We analyzed secondary Personal Outcome Measures® (POM) interview data from 5,869 people with disabilities who received Medicaid HCBS (2016–2024). People with disabilities who received HCBS had 48.4% of personal outcomes and 51.3% of person-centered organizational supports present, with indicators related to choice and control being the least present. Outcomes and supports were also less present after the HCBS Settings Rule implementation deadline. While the HCBS Settings Rule represents important values for choice and integration in theory, our findings suggest they are not frequently upheld and implemented on the ground.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inclusion
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-13.4.308
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps Between Policy and Practice: Outcomes and Supports of People With Disabilities Who Receive HCBS

Carli Friedman
Inclusion
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Gaps Between Policy and Practice: Outcomes and Supports of People With Disabilities Who Receive HCBS

Carli Friedman
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the quality of life outcomes (personal outcomes) and person-centered supports of people with disabilities who receive Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS). We analyzed secondary Personal Outcome Measures® (POM) interview data from 5,869 people with disabilities who received Medicaid HCBS (2016–2024). People with disabilities who received HCBS had 48.4% of personal outcomes and 51.3% of person-centered organizational supports present, with indicators related to choice and control being the least present. Outcomes and supports were also less present after the HCBS Settings Rule implementation deadline. While the HCBS Settings Rule represents important values for choice and integration in theory, our findings suggest they are not frequently upheld and implemented on the ground.

InclusionVol. 13(4)
Council on Environmental Quality (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.