Long-term safety and effectiveness of hybrid coronary revascularization compared to conventional revascularization strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
HCR demonstrates comparable safety and effectiveness to CABG for MVCAD, with similar rates of key outcomes at both 30 days and 1 year. Further research with larger samples and longer follow-up is recommended to confirm these findings.
Authors
- Pugazhendi Inban
- Seba Albitar
- Singam Shashank
- Mohammed Dheyaa Marsool Marsool (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-4534)
- Chiranjeevee R Saravanan
- Omniat Amir Hussin
- Nikhil Deep Kolanu
- Harshada Santosh Keluskar
- Nanditha Karra
- Mohammed Hady Albitar
- Rashmikaa Netyam
- Ziad Helaly
- Abdullah Sharbek
Institutions
- Alfaisal University (SA)
- University of Khartoum (SD)
- Madras Medical College (IN)
- Kazan State Medical University (RU)
- St. Clare Hospital in Lakewood (US)
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- The Future University (SD)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
- China Medical University (CN)
- Osmania Medical College (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Annals of Medicine and Surgery
- Published
- 2025-12-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000004561
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00