S2726 National Disparities in Variceal Upper GI Hemorrhage Between Teaching and Non-Teaching Institutions

Introduction: This study evaluates national outcomes for variceal upper GI hemorrhage (VUGIH) treated at teaching vs non-teaching facilities. Methods: National Inpatient Sample data from 2016 to 2020 was analyzed for VUGIH. In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome assessed. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes categorized patients by facility teaching status, insurance status, sex, and race. A multivariate logistic regression evaluated risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included variceal banding rates, time to endoscopy, TIPS placement, and time to TIPS. P < 0.05 was statistically significant. AI software ChatGPT was utilized to verify statistical analyses. Results: In 333,120 patients with VUGIH, teaching facilities had higher in-hospital mortality (10.6% vs 8.2%; OR 1.27 [1.23-1.30]; P < 0.01). Variceal banding was similar with no statistically significant difference between teaching and non-teaching hospitals (36.4% vs 37.7%; OR 0.94; P = 0.052). Time to endoscopy was longer in teaching facilities (1.2 days vs 1 day; P = 0.012). Teaching facilities performed TIPS procedures more often (0.75% vs 0.19%; OR 3.42; P < 0.01) however time to TIPS was similar (1.7 days vs 1.4 days; P = 0.07). Multivariate logistic regression revealed several other risk factors for in-hospital mortality. These included malignancy, CHF, HIV, CVA, male sex, Asian race, and uninsured status all increased risk of mortality (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Teaching hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality, likely reflecting greater patient complexity. Similar banding rates suggest similar access to endoscopic treatment. Time to TIPS, though not statistically different, did approach near significance (P = 0.07). This difference may be attributed to slightly longer times to endoscopy and TIPS at teaching facilities. Despite correction with multivariate logistic regression that confirmed risk factors that increased in-hospital mortality, our analysis revealed 27% higher odds of mortality in teaching hospitals. This may reflect unaccounted for variables that may be contributing to the higher mortality rates. Factors such as active alcohol use, degree of hepatic disease, and severity of portal hypertension were not assessed. Limitations of our study include its retrospective design, use of ICD-10 codes, and lack of access to procedural findings. AI ChatGPT verified our statistical analyses. Despite these limitations, the large sample size and multivariate analysis strengthen our findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138364.08339.96
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2726 National Disparities in Variceal Upper GI Hemorrhage Between Teaching and Non-Teaching Institutions

Thayer Hamoudah, Ammar Aqeel, Amir Khan, Luqman Baloch et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2726 National Disparities in Variceal Upper GI Hemorrhage Between Teaching and Non-Teaching Institutions

Thayer Hamoudah, Ammar Aqeel, Amir Khan, Luqman Baloch, Naser Khan, Sultan Ahmed, Baseer Qazi, Ahmet Sakiri, Abu Fahad Abbasi, Altaf Dawood
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluates national outcomes for variceal upper GI hemorrhage (VUGIH) treated at teaching vs non-teaching facilities. Methods: National Inpatient Sample data from 2016 to 2020 was analyzed for VUGIH. In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome assessed. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes categorized patients by facility teaching status, insurance status, sex, and race. A multivariate logistic regression evaluated risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included variceal banding rates, time to endoscopy, TIPS placement, and time to TIPS. P < 0.05 was statistically significant. AI software ChatGPT was utilized to verify statistical analyses. Results: In 333,120 patients with VUGIH, teaching facilities had higher in-hospital mortality (10.6% vs 8.2%; OR 1.27 [1.23-1.30]; P < 0.01). Variceal banding was similar with no statistically significant difference between teaching and non-teaching hospitals (36.4% vs 37.7%; OR 0.94; P = 0.052). Time to endoscopy was longer in teaching facilities (1.2 days vs 1 day; P = 0.012). Teaching facilities performed TIPS procedures more often (0.75% vs 0.19%; OR 3.42; P < 0.01) however time to TIPS was similar (1.7 days vs 1.4 days; P = 0.07). Multivariate logistic regression revealed several other risk factors for in-hospital mortality. These included malignancy, CHF, HIV, CVA, male sex, Asian race, and uninsured status all increased risk of mortality (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Teaching hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality, likely reflecting greater patient complexity. Similar banding rates suggest similar access to endoscopic treatment. Time to TIPS, though not statistically different, did approach near significance (P = 0.07). This difference may be attributed to slightly longer times to endoscopy and TIPS at teaching facilities. Despite correction with multivariate logistic regression that confirmed risk factors that increased in-hospital mortality, our analysis revealed 27% higher odds of mortality in teaching hospitals. This may reflect unaccounted for variables that may be contributing to the higher mortality rates. Factors such as active alcohol use, degree of hepatic disease, and severity of portal hypertension were not assessed. Limitations of our study include its retrospective design, use of ICD-10 codes, and lack of access to procedural findings. AI ChatGPT verified our statistical analyses. Despite these limitations, the large sample size and multivariate analysis strengthen our findings.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.