S2745 Limited Hepatology Care for High-Risk Cirrhosis Patients in a Health System That Utilizes Two Electronic Medical Records

Introduction: In current practice, patients with MELD scores >15 are referred for liver transplant evaluation. In April 2022, our health system started hepatology clinics and liver transplant services. Presently, these services use an electronic medical record system that is distinct from the one used in the outpatient group practice. Our study’s aim was to analyze linkage to care for hepatology services within this dynamic. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patient records, including inpatient and outpatient notes, from January 2022 to April 2024. We included any patient with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code related to cirrhosis or portal hypertension and aged between 18 and 91 years old through an electronic algorithm. Patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma or underwent liver transplant were excluded from the analysis. We collected basic demographic data and the most recent clinical lab values to characterize liver disease burden and calculate a MELD 3.0 score. Results: A total of 1,786 patients were retrieved from records, with 848 having lab values for MELD 3.0. Of those, 59.6% had a MELD 3.0 > 15 (n = 505). The average age was 61. Of those with a MELD 3.0 > 15, 60.8% were men (n = 307), and 39.2% were women (n = 198). 50.3% were African Americans (n = 254), 28.1% were White (n = 142), 20.6% self-identified as Multiple/Other (n = 104), and 1.6% Asian (n = 8). 84.4% were inpatient visits (n = 426) and 15.6% were outpatient (n = 79). 67.1% lacked a primary care physician (n = 339). Overall, 49.1% with a MELD 3.0 > 15 did not receive a hepatology referral (n = 248). 81% of those were from inpatient visits (n = 201). 56% were men (n = 140) and 44% were women (n = 109). 30.6% were African Americans (n = 76), 13.7% White (n = 34), 11.3% Multiple/Other (n = 28), and 1.2% Asian (n = 3). Conclusion: Among 848 patients with MELD 3.0 scores, 59.6% (n = 505) had scores greater than 15. Despite this, 49.1% (n = 248) did not receive referrals for outpatient hepatology care. This issue is exacerbated by 67.1% (n = 339) of patients lacking a primary care physician. Further research is needed to develop mechanisms through the electronic medical record systems that achieve adequate linkage to care in this patient population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138440.81703.02
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2745 Limited Hepatology Care for High-Risk Cirrhosis Patients in a Health System That Utilizes Two Electronic Medical Records

Ahmed Attia, Ali Alsaad, Ameer Abutaleb, Abdelrhman Refaey et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

S2745 Limited Hepatology Care for High-Risk Cirrhosis Patients in a Health System That Utilizes Two Electronic Medical Records

Ahmed Attia, Ali Alsaad, Ameer Abutaleb, Abdelrhman Refaey, Ahmed Ebeid, Mohamed Abdou, Puja Sasankan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In current practice, patients with MELD scores >15 are referred for liver transplant evaluation. In April 2022, our health system started hepatology clinics and liver transplant services. Presently, these services use an electronic medical record system that is distinct from the one used in the outpatient group practice. Our study’s aim was to analyze linkage to care for hepatology services within this dynamic. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patient records, including inpatient and outpatient notes, from January 2022 to April 2024. We included any patient with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code related to cirrhosis or portal hypertension and aged between 18 and 91 years old through an electronic algorithm. Patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma or underwent liver transplant were excluded from the analysis. We collected basic demographic data and the most recent clinical lab values to characterize liver disease burden and calculate a MELD 3.0 score. Results: A total of 1,786 patients were retrieved from records, with 848 having lab values for MELD 3.0. Of those, 59.6% had a MELD 3.0 > 15 (n = 505). The average age was 61. Of those with a MELD 3.0 > 15, 60.8% were men (n = 307), and 39.2% were women (n = 198). 50.3% were African Americans (n = 254), 28.1% were White (n = 142), 20.6% self-identified as Multiple/Other (n = 104), and 1.6% Asian (n = 8). 84.4% were inpatient visits (n = 426) and 15.6% were outpatient (n = 79). 67.1% lacked a primary care physician (n = 339). Overall, 49.1% with a MELD 3.0 > 15 did not receive a hepatology referral (n = 248). 81% of those were from inpatient visits (n = 201). 56% were men (n = 140) and 44% were women (n = 109). 30.6% were African Americans (n = 76), 13.7% White (n = 34), 11.3% Multiple/Other (n = 28), and 1.2% Asian (n = 3). Conclusion: Among 848 patients with MELD 3.0 scores, 59.6% (n = 505) had scores greater than 15. Despite this, 49.1% (n = 248) did not receive referrals for outpatient hepatology care. This issue is exacerbated by 67.1% (n = 339) of patients lacking a primary care physician. Further research is needed to develop mechanisms through the electronic medical record systems that achieve adequate linkage to care in this patient population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.