S2754 Performance of Blood-Based Noninvasive Tests (NITs) in Predicting cACLD and CSPH to Facilitate Referral to Liver Clinics

Introduction: Baveno VII criteria recommend vibration-controlled transient elastography (FibroScan) to diagnose compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). However, FibroScan is not widely available in primary care and resource limited settings. We aimed to compare the accuracy of easily available blood-based noninvasive tests (NITs) to predict cACLD, CSPH and hepatic steatosis (HS). Methods: In a US veteran cohort (n = 1298, referred from primary care to liver clinic between 2017 and 2024), we compared the NITs- APRI, FIB-4 score, NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) with cACLD and CSPH (FibroScan-liver stiffness measurement and platelet count). We also compared another NIT, hepatic steatotic index (HSI) with FibroScan-continued attenuation parameter (CAP). HS was defined as CAP ≥288 dB/m. Results: Mean age was 61.2 (±11.4) years (91% men; 68.4% Whites, 44.1% MASLD, 31.1% chronic hepatitis C). Median BMI was 30.3 (25.9-35). cACLD was present in 14.3%, CSPH in 5.5%, and HS in 52.7%. The predictive accuracy (AUROCs [±SE]) of FIB-4 and APRI for cACLD were 0.788 (0.029) and 0.738 (0.019) and for CSPH were 0.907 (0.013) and 0.839 (0.019) respectively. At a cut-off of 3.25, FIB-4 had 77.1% sensitivity and 85.2% specificity for predicting cACLD (P = 0.001), and 76.4% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity for predicting CSPH (P = 0.001). In subgroup analysis of patients with MASLD, the AUROC (SE) for FIB-4, APRI and NFS for predicting cACLD were 0.788 (0.029), 0.753 (0.031) and 0.743 (0.031) and for predicting CSPH were 0.931 (0.017), 0.846 (0.029) and 0.862 (0.036) respectively. At a cut-off of 2.67, FIB-4 had 79.2% sensitivity and 85.2% specificity for predicting cACLD (P = 0.001) and 79.3% sensitivity and 84.0% specificity for predicting CSPH (P = 0.001). For predicting HS, the HSI at cut-off 36 had 81% sensitivity and 53% specificity, P = 0.001 (AUROC 0.677 [0.027]). In MASLD subgroup, HSI had 91.8% sensitivity and 64.1% specificity, P = 0.001 (AUROC of 0.763 [0.019]) with the same cut-off. Conclusion: NITs identified patients with cACLD and CSPH with acceptable and good predictive accuracy respectively. Among the NITs, FIB-4 had the highest accuracy for predicting cACLD and CSPH, irrespective of etiology of liver disease. Similarly, HSI had acceptable accuracy for identifying hepatic steatosis in MASLD. NITs can help identify and expedite referral of high-risk patients (with cACLD and CSPH) to specialized liver clinics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138476.60852.b4
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2754 Performance of Blood-Based Noninvasive Tests (NITs) in Predicting cACLD and CSPH to Facilitate Referral to Liver Clinics

Ragesh B. Thandassery, Srikanth Vallurupalli, Suria Devarapalli
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2754 Performance of Blood-Based Noninvasive Tests (NITs) in Predicting cACLD and CSPH to Facilitate Referral to Liver Clinics

Ragesh B. Thandassery, Srikanth Vallurupalli, Suria Devarapalli
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Baveno VII criteria recommend vibration-controlled transient elastography (FibroScan) to diagnose compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). However, FibroScan is not widely available in primary care and resource limited settings. We aimed to compare the accuracy of easily available blood-based noninvasive tests (NITs) to predict cACLD, CSPH and hepatic steatosis (HS). Methods: In a US veteran cohort (n = 1298, referred from primary care to liver clinic between 2017 and 2024), we compared the NITs- APRI, FIB-4 score, NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) with cACLD and CSPH (FibroScan-liver stiffness measurement and platelet count). We also compared another NIT, hepatic steatotic index (HSI) with FibroScan-continued attenuation parameter (CAP). HS was defined as CAP ≥288 dB/m. Results: Mean age was 61.2 (±11.4) years (91% men; 68.4% Whites, 44.1% MASLD, 31.1% chronic hepatitis C). Median BMI was 30.3 (25.9-35). cACLD was present in 14.3%, CSPH in 5.5%, and HS in 52.7%. The predictive accuracy (AUROCs [±SE]) of FIB-4 and APRI for cACLD were 0.788 (0.029) and 0.738 (0.019) and for CSPH were 0.907 (0.013) and 0.839 (0.019) respectively. At a cut-off of 3.25, FIB-4 had 77.1% sensitivity and 85.2% specificity for predicting cACLD (P = 0.001), and 76.4% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity for predicting CSPH (P = 0.001). In subgroup analysis of patients with MASLD, the AUROC (SE) for FIB-4, APRI and NFS for predicting cACLD were 0.788 (0.029), 0.753 (0.031) and 0.743 (0.031) and for predicting CSPH were 0.931 (0.017), 0.846 (0.029) and 0.862 (0.036) respectively. At a cut-off of 2.67, FIB-4 had 79.2% sensitivity and 85.2% specificity for predicting cACLD (P = 0.001) and 79.3% sensitivity and 84.0% specificity for predicting CSPH (P = 0.001). For predicting HS, the HSI at cut-off 36 had 81% sensitivity and 53% specificity, P = 0.001 (AUROC 0.677 [0.027]). In MASLD subgroup, HSI had 91.8% sensitivity and 64.1% specificity, P = 0.001 (AUROC of 0.763 [0.019]) with the same cut-off. Conclusion: NITs identified patients with cACLD and CSPH with acceptable and good predictive accuracy respectively. Among the NITs, FIB-4 had the highest accuracy for predicting cACLD and CSPH, irrespective of etiology of liver disease. Similarly, HSI had acceptable accuracy for identifying hepatic steatosis in MASLD. NITs can help identify and expedite referral of high-risk patients (with cACLD and CSPH) to specialized liver clinics.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.