S2749 No Significant Differences in Risk of Cirrhosis or Overall Mortality Between Untreated Immune Tolerant vs Treated Immune Active Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Introduction: While most existing guidelines do not recommend treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in the immune tolerant phase, there are emerging data that risks of disease progression in untreated immune tolerant (U-IT) are not negligible and in some cases, this risk is higher than treated immune active (T-IA) CHB patients. However, most of these studies have been conducted in Asian countries, and few data in Western populations are available. We aim to evaluate long-term risks of cirrhosis and overall mortality between U-IT vs T-IA CHB patients among a national cohort of U.S. Veterans. Methods: Using national Veterans Affairs data, we identified adults with CHB (minimum ≥1 year follow-up) that met criteria for U-IT or T-IA from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2021 (with follow-up through 12/31/2024). Patients with concurrent HIV, HCV, HDV, or prior cirrhosis or HCC diagnosis were excluded. Propensity score weighting (PSW) methods were applied to balance baseline factors. Primary outcomes were development of cirrhosis or death/liver transplant [LT] (censoring event 6 months after start of antiviral therapy in U-IT or end of the study period). Incidence of cirrhosis or death/LT (per 100 person-years [py]) was compared between U-IT and T-IA, and Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated differences in risk of cirrhosis or death/LT between groups. Results: Among 591 U-IT and 555 T-IA CHB patients identified, baseline characteristics were similar after PSW (mean age 56.4-57.5 years, 45-50% non-Hispanic White, 37-40% African American, 9-10% Asian, 25-29% concurrent diabetes, 35-39% with FIB-4 >3.25). Over a median follow-up of 6.4 years (IQR 3.0-10.4), the incidence of cirrhosis or death/LT was similar between T-IA vs U-IT groups (cirrhosis: 3.79 [95% CI 3.39-4.25] vs 3.64 [95% CI 3.23-4.10] per 100 py, P = 0.62; death/LT: 3.47 [95% CI 3.08-3.91] vs 3.59 [95% CI 3.18-4.04] per 100 py, P = 0.70). On Cox proportional hazards regression, when compared to T-IA CHB, no difference in risk of cirrhosis or death/LT was observed in U-IT CHB patients (cirrhosis: HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.10, P = 0.44; death/LT: HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.23, P = 0.65). Conclusion: Among a longitudinal national cohort of Veterans with CHB, no significant differences in long-term risks of cirrhosis or death/LT was observed between U-IT vs T-IA patients. Antiviral therapy in IA CHB patients is effective in reducing risks of cirrhosis or death/LT to levels similar to U-IT patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138456.86950.3c
Primary Topic
Hepatitis C virus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2749 No Significant Differences in Risk of Cirrhosis or Overall Mortality Between Untreated Immune Tolerant vs Treated Immune Active Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Robert J. Wong, Ramsey Cheung, Zeyuan Yang
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Hepatitis C virus research
article

S2749 No Significant Differences in Risk of Cirrhosis or Overall Mortality Between Untreated Immune Tolerant vs Treated Immune Active Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Robert J. Wong, Ramsey Cheung, Zeyuan Yang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: While most existing guidelines do not recommend treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in the immune tolerant phase, there are emerging data that risks of disease progression in untreated immune tolerant (U-IT) are not negligible and in some cases, this risk is higher than treated immune active (T-IA) CHB patients. However, most of these studies have been conducted in Asian countries, and few data in Western populations are available. We aim to evaluate long-term risks of cirrhosis and overall mortality between U-IT vs T-IA CHB patients among a national cohort of U.S. Veterans. Methods: Using national Veterans Affairs data, we identified adults with CHB (minimum ≥1 year follow-up) that met criteria for U-IT or T-IA from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2021 (with follow-up through 12/31/2024). Patients with concurrent HIV, HCV, HDV, or prior cirrhosis or HCC diagnosis were excluded. Propensity score weighting (PSW) methods were applied to balance baseline factors. Primary outcomes were development of cirrhosis or death/liver transplant [LT] (censoring event 6 months after start of antiviral therapy in U-IT or end of the study period). Incidence of cirrhosis or death/LT (per 100 person-years [py]) was compared between U-IT and T-IA, and Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated differences in risk of cirrhosis or death/LT between groups. Results: Among 591 U-IT and 555 T-IA CHB patients identified, baseline characteristics were similar after PSW (mean age 56.4-57.5 years, 45-50% non-Hispanic White, 37-40% African American, 9-10% Asian, 25-29% concurrent diabetes, 35-39% with FIB-4 >3.25). Over a median follow-up of 6.4 years (IQR 3.0-10.4), the incidence of cirrhosis or death/LT was similar between T-IA vs U-IT groups (cirrhosis: 3.79 [95% CI 3.39-4.25] vs 3.64 [95% CI 3.23-4.10] per 100 py, P = 0.62; death/LT: 3.47 [95% CI 3.08-3.91] vs 3.59 [95% CI 3.18-4.04] per 100 py, P = 0.70). On Cox proportional hazards regression, when compared to T-IA CHB, no difference in risk of cirrhosis or death/LT was observed in U-IT CHB patients (cirrhosis: HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.10, P = 0.44; death/LT: HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.23, P = 0.65). Conclusion: Among a longitudinal national cohort of Veterans with CHB, no significant differences in long-term risks of cirrhosis or death/LT was observed between U-IT vs T-IA patients. Antiviral therapy in IA CHB patients is effective in reducing risks of cirrhosis or death/LT to levels similar to U-IT patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Hepatitis C virus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.