S2645 Exploring Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Decompensated Cirrhosis

Introduction: Liver transplantation is the gold standard for decompensated cirrhosis, yet access remains inequitable. Studies suggest racial and socioeconomic disparities, but detailed exploration of these factors among patients hospitalized for decompensated cirrhosis is limited. Understanding these gaps is vital to promoting equitable care. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016–2019), we identified patients admitted for decompensated cirrhosis, excluding those with malignancy or missing data, resulting in a cohort of 830,005 patients. Of these, 2,425 received liver transplants during hospitalization. We analyzed baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and costs by race. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for socioeconomic factors, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and cirrhosis etiology, was used to determine the impact of race and socioeconomic status on transplant likelihood. Results: The mean age of transplant recipients varied significantly by race, with Native American patients being the youngest (52.6 years) and Asian/Pacific Islanders the oldest (60.91 years) (P < 0.001). Women were less likely to receive transplants compared to men across all racial groups (P < 0.001). White patients had the highest proportion of private insurance (26.3%), while Medicaid coverage was most common among Black (21.1%) and Hispanic (23.8%) patients. Regional variations existed, with the Midwest demonstrating lower odds (aOR 0.84, P = 0.015) compared to the Northeast. Socioeconomic status was a significant predictor, with patients from the highest income quartile being 45% more likely to receive a transplant than those from the lowest quartile (aOR 1.45, P < 0.001). Hispanic patients were more likely to receive transplants than Whites (aOR 1.23, P < 0.001), while Native American patients had lower odds (aOR 0.62, P = 0.037). Despite adjustments, Black patients trended towards lower likelihood, but results did not reach statistical significance (aOR 0.86, P = 0.059). Conclusion: Disparities in liver transplantation for decompensated cirrhosis are driven by a complex interplay of racial, socioeconomic, and regional factors. The finding that Hispanic patients had higher odds of transplantation, while Native Americans and potentially Black patients were disadvantaged, warrants further investigation. Addressing these inequities requires targeted policy reforms and public health interventions to address systemic barriers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138040.31875.0f
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2645 Exploring Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Decompensated Cirrhosis

Sarah Meribout, Nakul Mahajan, Yasutoshi Shiratori, Fatima Khan et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2645 Exploring Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Decompensated Cirrhosis

Sarah Meribout, Nakul Mahajan, Yasutoshi Shiratori, Fatima Khan, Ahmed Salem, Anis L. Meribout, Saida Benmostefa, Ovanes Karslyan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Liver transplantation is the gold standard for decompensated cirrhosis, yet access remains inequitable. Studies suggest racial and socioeconomic disparities, but detailed exploration of these factors among patients hospitalized for decompensated cirrhosis is limited. Understanding these gaps is vital to promoting equitable care. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016–2019), we identified patients admitted for decompensated cirrhosis, excluding those with malignancy or missing data, resulting in a cohort of 830,005 patients. Of these, 2,425 received liver transplants during hospitalization. We analyzed baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and costs by race. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for socioeconomic factors, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and cirrhosis etiology, was used to determine the impact of race and socioeconomic status on transplant likelihood. Results: The mean age of transplant recipients varied significantly by race, with Native American patients being the youngest (52.6 years) and Asian/Pacific Islanders the oldest (60.91 years) (P < 0.001). Women were less likely to receive transplants compared to men across all racial groups (P < 0.001). White patients had the highest proportion of private insurance (26.3%), while Medicaid coverage was most common among Black (21.1%) and Hispanic (23.8%) patients. Regional variations existed, with the Midwest demonstrating lower odds (aOR 0.84, P = 0.015) compared to the Northeast. Socioeconomic status was a significant predictor, with patients from the highest income quartile being 45% more likely to receive a transplant than those from the lowest quartile (aOR 1.45, P < 0.001). Hispanic patients were more likely to receive transplants than Whites (aOR 1.23, P < 0.001), while Native American patients had lower odds (aOR 0.62, P = 0.037). Despite adjustments, Black patients trended towards lower likelihood, but results did not reach statistical significance (aOR 0.86, P = 0.059). Conclusion: Disparities in liver transplantation for decompensated cirrhosis are driven by a complex interplay of racial, socioeconomic, and regional factors. The finding that Hispanic patients had higher odds of transplantation, while Native Americans and potentially Black patients were disadvantaged, warrants further investigation. Addressing these inequities requires targeted policy reforms and public health interventions to address systemic barriers.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.