S2653 Rates of Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotics With or Without Clotting Disorders: A 7-Year Nationwide Study on Rates of PVT

Introduction: Cirrhotics can be both hypercoagulable and hypocoagulable, with various reasons for either state. A common thrombotic event in this group is portal venous thrombosis (PVT)—many reasons for this to occur. Current research states that inherited hemostatic disorders do not predict the development of PVT. In this study, various thrombophilias were analyzed: activated protein C resistance (APCR), prothrombin gene mutation (PTM), paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), other thrombophilia (OT), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2015-2021 was used to identify patients diagnosed with cirrhosis with or without thrombophilias using the International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Records were weighted per the NIS algorithm to produce accurate population estimates. Cirrhotic patients with or without thrombophilia were analyzed for baseline characteristics. Various primary outcomes were analyzed, which included PVT, death, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), shock, and composite outcomes. Secondary outcomes were analyzed, which included transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) during hospitalization, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges. Results: A weighted total of 2,391,389 patients with cirrhosis without a known coagulation pathology, 4,075 patients with cirrhosis and APCR, 425 patients with cirrhosis and PTM, 175 patients with cirrhosis and PNH, 14,155 patients with cirrhosis and DIC. Cirrhotic patients with PTM had the highest odds of developing PVT (OR (95% CI): 2.848 (2.24-3.62) APCR, 8.801 (5.471-14.157) PTM, 4.286 (3.708-4.955) OT, 2.904 (0.908-9.286) PNH, 1.744 (1.49-2.04) DIC). Cirrhotic patients with DIC had higher odds of death (OR (95% CI): 24.748 (22.82-26.839) DIC), AKI (7.458 (6.82-8.155), AMI (3.205 (2.801-3.667)), shock (21.454 (19.793-23.254)), and overall worse outcomes (15.912 (14.127-17.922)). Secondary outcomes were analyzed, which included higher odds of TIPS during hospitalization for cirrhotic patients with DIC (1.913 (1.369-2.674)). In turn, cirrhotic patients with DIC had greater lengths of stay (LOS) (5.270 (4.759-5.781)) and greater hospital charges (168463 (147901-189024)). Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis and thrombophilic disorders had higher odds of PVT, which supports alterations in coagulation factors as predictive factors in the development of PVT.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138072.36857.7d
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2653 Rates of Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotics With or Without Clotting Disorders: A 7-Year Nationwide Study on Rates of PVT

Jaspreet Singh, James R. Pellegrini, Samuel M. Greenberg, Tayab Kirmani et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2653 Rates of Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotics With or Without Clotting Disorders: A 7-Year Nationwide Study on Rates of PVT

Jaspreet Singh, James R. Pellegrini, Samuel M. Greenberg, Tayab Kirmani, Andrej M Sodoma
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Cirrhotics can be both hypercoagulable and hypocoagulable, with various reasons for either state. A common thrombotic event in this group is portal venous thrombosis (PVT)—many reasons for this to occur. Current research states that inherited hemostatic disorders do not predict the development of PVT. In this study, various thrombophilias were analyzed: activated protein C resistance (APCR), prothrombin gene mutation (PTM), paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), other thrombophilia (OT), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2015-2021 was used to identify patients diagnosed with cirrhosis with or without thrombophilias using the International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Records were weighted per the NIS algorithm to produce accurate population estimates. Cirrhotic patients with or without thrombophilia were analyzed for baseline characteristics. Various primary outcomes were analyzed, which included PVT, death, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), shock, and composite outcomes. Secondary outcomes were analyzed, which included transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) during hospitalization, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges. Results: A weighted total of 2,391,389 patients with cirrhosis without a known coagulation pathology, 4,075 patients with cirrhosis and APCR, 425 patients with cirrhosis and PTM, 175 patients with cirrhosis and PNH, 14,155 patients with cirrhosis and DIC. Cirrhotic patients with PTM had the highest odds of developing PVT (OR (95% CI): 2.848 (2.24-3.62) APCR, 8.801 (5.471-14.157) PTM, 4.286 (3.708-4.955) OT, 2.904 (0.908-9.286) PNH, 1.744 (1.49-2.04) DIC). Cirrhotic patients with DIC had higher odds of death (OR (95% CI): 24.748 (22.82-26.839) DIC), AKI (7.458 (6.82-8.155), AMI (3.205 (2.801-3.667)), shock (21.454 (19.793-23.254)), and overall worse outcomes (15.912 (14.127-17.922)). Secondary outcomes were analyzed, which included higher odds of TIPS during hospitalization for cirrhotic patients with DIC (1.913 (1.369-2.674)). In turn, cirrhotic patients with DIC had greater lengths of stay (LOS) (5.270 (4.759-5.781)) and greater hospital charges (168463 (147901-189024)). Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis and thrombophilic disorders had higher odds of PVT, which supports alterations in coagulation factors as predictive factors in the development of PVT.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.